Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2017 (10) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (10) TMI 1562 - HC - Indian LawsDishonor of Cheque - no contemporaneous signatures are available on any unauthenticated documents - Section 45 of the Evidence Act - HELD THAT:- In view of the law declared by the Courts in the catena of judgments, it is clear that, if the order under challenge is allowed to sustain, would terminate or culminate the entire proceedings, is a determining factor to entertain a revision under Section 397 Cr.P.C - But, here, the order under challenge is an order passed on an application filed under Section 45 of the Evidence Act, the same would not culminate the entire proceedings. In view of the law declared by the Apex Court in "Sethuraman v. Rajamanickam " [2009 (3) TMI 1086 - SUPREME COURT], the order passed on an application filed under Section 45 of Evidence Act is interlocutory in nature and against such an order, no revision is maintainable. The orders under challenge are only interlocutory in nature, as they are orders passed on an application filed under Section 45 of the Evidence Act and they would not terminate or culminate the entire proceedings, if the same are allowed to sustain - the criminal revision cases are not maintainable in view of the bar under Section 397(2) Cr.P.C. - criminal revision cases are dismissed.
|