Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2015 (9) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (9) TMI 1711 - HC - Indian LawsSummon Order as additional accused to face trial in FIR, even if not named in FIR - HELD THAT:- The complainant - Tara Chand while appearing as PW-1 has mentioned the names of the petitioners, who have caused injuries to his son Sonu with kick and fist blows. He has stated that Sonu was in love with Suman and the accused Rajender, Ram Piari, Ravi, Ravinder and Suman did not like this. Thus, there are specific allegations against the petitioners not only in the FIR but in the statement of the complainant as well. In the case of HARDEEP SINGH, MANJIT PAL SINGH, BABUBHAI BHIMABHAI BOKHIRIA, RAJENDRA SHARMA, RAVINDER KUMAR, TEJ PAL, JUNED PAHALWAN, RAJESH @ SANJAI, RAMDHAN MALI, TEJ SINGH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB, STATE OF GUJARAT, STATE OF M.P., STATE OF HARYANA, STATE OF U.P., STATE OF RAJASTHAN. [2014 (1) TMI 1878 - SUPREME COURT], Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a person can be summoned, as an additional accused, even if he is not named in the FIR or if named in the FIR but not chargesheeted or even if he has been discharged. The trial Court while taking into consideration the evidence on record, has rightly summoned the petitioners as additional accused, to face trial along with other co-accused - The present petition, being devoid of any merit, is dismissed.
|