Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2017 (4) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (4) TMI 1607 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURTSeeking the reopening of the evidence - sending the suit promissory note Ex. A.1 for examination to a Handwriting Expert - HELD THAT:- It is an admitted fact that the science relating to forensic examination of Handwriting, especially in relation to the fixation of the age of the ink, is not perfect. In cases of this nature any reference of a document to the Handwriting Expert just for the purpose of finding out whether the ink was 5 years old at the time of institution of the suit or 3 years old at the time of institution of the suit, is not likely to bring any fruitful result. Interestingly in one of the books relied upon by the learned Judge of the Madras High Court, namely "Handwriting Forensics" by B.R. Sharma, Chapter 25 contains a Glossary under the title "Documenpaedia". In the said chapter, there is an interesting portion relating to "INK AGE". Thus, it is clear that no useful purpose will be served by referring the document to the Handwriting Expert. Hence, the dismissal of the applications by the Court below cannot be found fault with. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed.
|