Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AAR Customs - 2022 (8) TMI AAR This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (8) TMI 1393 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MUMBAIClassification of goods proposed to be imported - handheld mobile computers - classifiable under Heading 8471 or under Heading 8517? - HELD THAT:- These are portable devices used in enterprise environments to run mobile apps, capture barcodes, take photos and videos, and provide voice and data communications for workers and managers. These devices combine personal computer and scanning functions (applies to mobile computers and tablet computers) in a single device that can be outfitted with off-the-shelf or custom software applications that perform everyday tasks, such as monitoring deliveries, tracking assets, and managing inventory. And because they run on familiar operating systems such as Windows/Android, they offer the same functionality as a desktop computer or laptop. These processors are also equipped with a barcode scan engine and act as their own host, which means one can instantly update and edit information as it is captured. Note 6(D) to Chapter 84 lists certain separately presented products that are to be excluded from Heading 8471, even if they can be classified as part of an ADP system. Note 6(E) to Chapter 84 mentions that a machine incorporating or working in conjunction with an automatic data processing machine and performing a specific function other than data processing are to be classified in the headings appropriate to their respective functions or, failing that, in residual headings. As the impugned devices, as described by the applicant, appear to be akin to ADP machines performing capturing of data and its further processing, the Notes 6(D) and 6(E) do not appear to have application in this case. In the instant case, these devices combine computing and scanning functions for monitoring deliveries, tracking assets, and managing inventory. They also have communication capabilities. However, for the products under consideration, automatic data processing appears to be the main function, while other functionalities of said machines are not different from auxiliary functions that could be seen on any computer, such as desktop or laptop computers. The difference between a “'smartphone” and “tablet computer”, is not based on whether the product has a voice calling function or not, but on the principal features that a producer has intended for the device when designing and developing it”. Thus, as per the said circular, tablet computers are classifiable under Heading 8471 and not under Heading 8517 despite the fact that the product is having cellular connection functionality, considering its principal function as automatic data processing. Similarly, in this case, the principal function of the impugned devices is barcode scanning and data processing for monitoring deliveries, tracking assets and managing inventory. Therefore, these devices appear to merit classification under Heading 8471 and not under Heading 8517. The impugned devices have many features such as higher scanning capacity, data editing functionality, ruggedness and enterprise-level security features, which a smartphone for cellular connection lacks. These devices are used by enterprises to capture data. The products are used in inventory management, store receiving, order processing, package tracking, tracing delivering etc. These devices use Wi-Fi connectivity and Bluetooth for information sharing. Cellular connectivity is essentially used for GPS and information sharing, where wi-fi is not available. Cellular connectivity can also be used for making calls - the devices under consideration are not classifiable as smartphones. They merit classification under sub-heading 8471 30 90. The 13 devices listed in the first paragraph of this ruling are classifiable under Heading 8471 and more specifically, under sub-heading 8471 30 90 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
|