Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2018 (5) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (5) TMI 2164 - AT - Income TaxUse of electronic record as evidence - Admission of additional ground - additions based on the materials retrieved from the CPU of the computer as seized by the Department during the course of search - as argued Department did not comply with the conditions mentioned u/s 65B(4) of the Evidence Act, when electronic record seized was used as evidence against the assessee - Whether by virtue of the provisions of clause (iib) of Section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 adopting the definition of `electronic record’ supplied by Section 2(1)(f) of the Information Technology Act, 200 to the data seized from a computer, the threshold determination related to the admissibility and legitimacy of such data in whatever form has not to be undertaken in accordance with law and in particular, the mandatory prescription of Sections 65A, 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872 read with Section 93 and the Second Schedule of the Information Technology Act, 2000; before raising the presumption under sub-section (4-A) of Section 132 and also before using a statement taken from any person on the basis of such seized data against the assessee under sub-section (4) of Section 132?” HELD THAT:- The additional ground raised is a pure legal issue and goes to the root of the matter since the major additions are based on the materials that are retrieved from the CPU of the computer that was seized by the Department during the course of search. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Anvar P.V. v. P.K.Basheer & Ors [2014 (9) TMI 1007 - SUPREME COURT] had held that if electronic record is being used as evidence, the conditions mentioned u/s 65B(4) of the Evidence Act has to be complied with. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of T.K.Sanalkumar v. CIT Cochin [2012 (7) TMI 1162 - SC ORDER] while disposing off SLP filed by the assessee, had directed the Commissioner to consider a ground which is identical to the additional ground raised by the assessee. The additional ground raised by the assessee is a legal issue, which is very vital for adjudicating the case, therefore, in the interest of justice and substantial cause, we admit the additional ground raised. Since the additional ground raised was not considered by the lower authorities, we restore the additional ground for adjudication to the files of the Assessing Officer. As we have restored the adjudication of the additional ground to the files of the A.O., the other issues which are there in these appeals are also to be adjudicated by the A.O. afresh.
|