Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2022 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (9) TMI 1561 - AT - Customs


Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus, specifically under Sr. No. 480.
2. Classification of the imported PVC compound under the Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 3904.
3. Determination of whether the imported PVC compound qualifies as "Polymers of Vinyl Chloride."

Detailed Analysis:

1. Eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus, specifically under Sr. No. 480:

The appellant filed a Bill of Entry claiming the benefit under Notification 021/2002 Sr. No. 480 for the import of PVC Compound TZ, arguing it falls under "Polymers of Vinyl Chloride." The assessing officer denied this exemption, instead extending the benefit of Sr. No. 559 of the same notification. The appellant contended that the addition of plasticizers, fillers, and stabilizers does not alter the chemical nature of PVC resin, and thus, the compound should still be considered under the exemption for "Polymers of Vinyl Chloride."

2. Classification of the imported PVC compound under the Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 3904:

The classification of the imported PVC compound under Heading 39.04 was not disputed by the Customs department. The appellant argued that Heading 39.04 covers all forms of PVC, including plasticized PVC, and that the exemption notification should apply to all forms and grades of PVC under this heading. The revenue, however, argued that the imported goods, being a result of a compounding process, are chemically modified and thus do not qualify as "Polymers of Vinyl Chloride" under Sr. No. 480.

3. Determination of whether the imported PVC compound qualifies as "Polymers of Vinyl Chloride":

The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the denial of the exemption under Sr. No. 480, noting that the polymer content of the imported goods was only 63%, whereas the subheading note requires 95% or more by weight of the total polymer content. The Tribunal, however, found that the classification under CTH 39042290 implicitly recognizes the goods as "Polymers of Vinyl Chloride." The Tribunal noted that the classification was not contested and that the goods were indeed classified under a heading that includes "Polymers of Vinyl Chloride." Therefore, the exemption under Sr. No. 480 should apply, as it covers all forms of PVC under Heading 3904.

The Tribunal referenced previous cases, including Ajay International Corporation Ltd. and Henkel Teroson India Ltd., where it was held that all forms of PVC, even those mixed with other substances, fall under Heading 3904 and are eligible for the exemption. The Tribunal concluded that the addition of plasticizers, fillers, and stabilizers does not disqualify the PVC compound from being classified as "Polymers of Vinyl Chloride" under the exemption notification.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and granting the exemption under Sr. No. 480 of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus, thereby recognizing the imported PVC compound as eligible for the concessional rate of duty.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates