Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2016 (5) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (5) TMI 220 - HC - Income TaxDisallowance u/s 14A - Held that:- Issues stands concluded in favour of the respondent-assessee and against the Revenue by virtue of the decision of this Court in Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of IncomeTax and another [2010 (8) TMI 77 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] . Amounts received from various public sector companies - whether were only advances and not receipts of income? - Held that:- We find that the respondent-assessee follows the mercantile system Accounting and adopting the percentage completion of method. The finding by the Tribunal that the amounts related to the milestones achieved during the year has been offered to tax in the subject assessment year is essentially a finding of fact. On principle it cannot be disputed that income only arises when the same has accrued to the respondent-assessee who follows the mercantile system of accounting. Tribunal was correct in its decision that the amounts received from various public sector companies were only advances and not receipts of income, based on the percentage completion method followed by the Company Appeal admitted on substantial questions of law at question nos. (iii) and (iv). (iii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the orders of the CIT(A) in regard to the liability on account of warranties? (iv) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in holding that the provision of warranty is an ascertained liability within the provisions of Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act?
|