Home Case Index All Cases Money Laundering Money Laundering + HC Money Laundering - 2018 (8) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (8) TMI 1651 - DELHI HIGH COURTDoE not complied with the requirements of the law - endorsement by the Petitioner’s husband on the arrest memo to the effect that he has been informed of the grounds of his arrest - Held that:- The legal position as on date is governed by the decision of this court in Moin Akhtar Qureshi v. Union of India (2017 (12) TMI 289 - DELHI HIGH COURT). It cannot therefore be held that the DoE has not complied with the requirements of the law. Consequently, this Court is not inclined to entertain ‘Prayer A’ made in the present petition. It shall however be open to the Petitioner to urge any other ground concerning the legality of the arrest of the Petitioner's husband arrest before the Roster Bench which will examined prayer B. ‘Prayer B’ of the petition challenges the validity of the order dated 6th August 2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (PMLA), New Delhi whereby the custody of the Petitioner’s husband has been extended by seven more days. To consider that prayer, the present petition be renumbered as a Criminal Revision Petition and be listed before the Roster Bench on 13th August 2018.
|