Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2018 (11) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (11) TMI 46 - AT - Income TaxLevy of late filing fees u/s 234E while issuing intimation u/s 200A - scope of amendment to section 200A - Held that:- In the present case, the undisputed facts are that the assessee filed its TDS return (Form 26Q) for the fourth quarter of financial year 2012-13 on 1.10.2013 and the same was processed and intimation under section 200A was issued vide order dated 25.12.2013 much prior to the amendment to section 200A w.e.f. 1.6.2015 empowering the AO levying the fees under section 234E of the Act. It is therefore not a case of continuing default where the assessee has defaulted in furnishing the TDS statement even after 1.6.2015 and thereafter, the demand for payment of fees under section 234E has been raised by the Assessing officer. In case of Fatheraj Singhvi [2016 (9) TMI 964 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] has held that the provisions of amended section 200A are prospective in nature. Further, the decision in case of M/s. Dundlod Shikshan Sansthan and Others [2015 (9) TMI 807 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] as relied by CIT (A) is in the context of validity of section 234E, but not in the context of power of AO for levy of fee under section 234E prior to 1.6.2015. In view of the above, AO while processing the TDS statements for the period prior to 01.06.2015, was not empowered to charge fees under section 234E of the Act. Hence, the demand raised by way of charging the fees under section 234E of the Act is not valid and the same is deleted.
|