Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + AT Companies Law - 2019 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (2) TMI 1045 - AT - Companies LawOppression and mismanagement - Counsel submitted that involvement of Respondent No.7 in the affairs was pleaded in detail in the Company Petition - Held that:- The e-mail addresses which are from same domain name “@DELOITTE.com”. The domain name appears to have been taken from Data Naming Server Authority by person/persons having commonality of interest. What appears is that different employees are putting their names using same domain name to do correspondence. This is not a matter where at present stage itself of the Petition, the Reply of Respondent No.7 should have been hurriedly accepted that Respondent No.7 had nothing to do with regard to services provided to Respondent No.1 Company. We find that at the stage of pleadings, it was material to see the averments in the Company Petition. The Petitioner made averments against Respondent No.7 on its own risk and consequences. Merely because Respondent comes and makes statement that I have nothing to do, is not enough to immediately delete the concerned Respondent from the array of parties. Appeal allowed - name of Respondent No.7 is restored to the array of parties in the Company Petition.
|