Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2019 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (3) TMI 829 - AT - CustomsRectification of mistake - power of Appellate Tribunal u/s 129B(2) of the Act to rectify mistake - scope of 'mistake' and 'apparent' - Held that:- It is no doubt true that evidence cannot be re-appreciated to come to a different conclusion and that ‘mistake apparent from the record’ cannot be something which is established by a long drawn process of reasoning of points on which there may conceivably be two opinions, but it is equally true that the purpose behind the enactment of Section 129B(2) of the Act is based on the fundamental principle that no party appearing before the Tribunal, be it an assessee or the Department, should suffer on account of any mistake committed by the Tribunal and that if a decision is based on a material which could not have been used, then the Tribunal would have the power to rectify the mistake. If the Tribunal has not considered the material evidence which was available on the record, it would amount to a mistake apparent on the face of the record and the Tribunal would have the jurisdiction to correct the said mistake. It is not merely an arithmetical or clerical mistake that can be rectified because ‘mistake’ in taxation laws has a different connotation and is mostly subjective. The mistake should be such which no Court would permit it to remain on the record for rectification of the order stems from the fundamental principle that justice is above all. If a decision is based solely on a material which is irrelevant or could not have been used then the mistake can be rectified. When it has been brought to the notice of the Tribunal that an issue was framed by the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Jodhpur as to whether the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) had the jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice and a detailed finding has been recorded that it had the jurisdiction, then it would be a fit case for exercise of powers under Section 129B(2) of the Act to rectify the mistake committed by Tribunal, which mistake is so apparent on the face of the record. The Appeals were disposed of earlier on 11 August, 2017 by remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for taking a fresh decision as the parties had agreed that the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Jodhpur was not the competent authority to issue notice. To rectify this mistake of the Tribunal, the entire order dated 11 August, 2017 would have to be recalled. It can be urged that this may not amount to rectification of mistake in the Final Order, but, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, as it has been found that the Tribunal committed a mistake in view of the consent given by the Respondent against the record, it has become necessary to recall the Final Order, as the issues raised in the Appeals, including that relating to jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) to issue the notice, have now to be decided on merits. Thus, it is a fit case for exercising the powers under Section 129B of the Act to correct the mistake apparent from the record and, accordingly, recall the order dated 11 August, 2017 - Let the Appeals be listed on 13 March, 2019.
|