Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2019 (5) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (5) TMI 1482 - AT - Service TaxLevy of service tax - amount of discount allowed to its customers - inadvertent credit in its books of account - turnover achieved through the main contractor - demand of service tax alongwith penalty - extended period of limitation. Discount allowed to customers - HELD THAT:- Revenue have not brought any evidence on record to disbelieve the books of account of the appellant. The auditor of the appellant, by certificate dated 11th November, 2014, have certified that the appellant have allowed discounts to their customers/clients and service tax will be charged on the net amount of the bill after allowing said discount - the learned Commissioner have erred in dis-regarding the said certificate, without recording any reason - demand set aside. Charge of service tax from the appellant as a subcontractor - HELD THAT:- This issue is decided by Hon’ble Patna High Court in the case of HINDUSTAN DORR-OLIVER LTD. AND ANOTHER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [1989 (9) TMI 355 - PATNA HIGH COURT], wherein the Hon'ble High Court in the matter of sales tax under similar facts and circumstances of works contract, were the main contractor had claimed deduction of the turnover achieved through the subcontractor, on the ground that the subcontractor is also registered with the Department and have paid tax on such turnover. The Hon'ble High Court held that in the case of works contract there is one transaction, one sale. The work may be done either by the main contractor or through the subcontractor. Service tax being the other part of the same type of transaction, there cannot be two services and/or two transfers of service - demand set aside. Credit made inadvertently in the books of account - HELD THAT:- It has been demonstrated that in the service receipt account, the accountant inadvertently made two journal entries on date 31st March, 2011, for making adjustment of “Cenvat credit adjustment”. Thus it is evident that the said credits, which have inflated the service receipt amount, are not actually the amounts pursuant to rendering of the service and are arising from erroneous entries by the accountant - demand set aside. Demand set aside - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant.
|