Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2019 (6) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (6) TMI 356 - HC - Income TaxReopening of assessment u/s 147 - validity of reasons to believe - non independent application of mind by AO - HELD THAT:- I am thus of the view that, in the light of the proviso to section 147, the assessee having made a complete disclosure of all relevant facts along with the return of income, the impugned proceedings are barred by limitation and also constitute a review of the original order of assessment, impermissible in law. In fact, the Assessing Officer is seen to have applied his mind to the issue in question and the original order of assessment confirms the position that various materials have been called for, such as accounts, financials, tax audit report, etc. and the assessee has also engaged in discussions with the Assessing Officer in regard to the issues that arise therefrom. The full and true disclosure of the assessee is thus not in doubt. AO in this case, is seen to simply reproduce the audit query as his reasons for reopening, which indicate categorically that there has been no independent application of mind in the least to the issued raised. It was incumbent upon the AO to have had independent ‘reasons to believe’ that there is escapement of tax, even if the initial nudge did emanate from the audit department. The ‘recording of reasons’ is mechanical and robotic and the mandate u/s 147 has not been complied with. TDS u/s 195 - TDS on foreign remittances relating to production related fees - HELD THAT:- Tax was deducted in respect of the payments effected by the petitioner to Nagie James Associates Ltd (UK), Mark Monitor INC (USA), Cososys SRL (USA) and Buena Vista International (USA). The sole remittance upon which tax was not deducted was in respect of the payment to Asianet Global FZ LLC, UAE, as the payment was in connection with production related fees and the Agreement for Avoidance for avoidance of Double Taxation between India and the UAE does not contain an Article providing for the taxation of Fees for Technical Services. In any event, the details of the remittances as well as the certification in Form 15B to this effect were duly furnished to the assessing authority even during the original proceedings and are, admittedly, on record. Amortisation of cost of programmes/films - , the expenditures incurred and claimed on programmes/film rights HELD THAT:- In fact, the petitioner has been following a consistent method of claiming expenditures in a particular fashion and the Department has accepted the methodology of valuation and claim for all years except the assessment years in question, being AY 2011-12 and 2013-14. In fact, even after the initiation of the present proceedings for re-assessment, orders under scrutiny have been passed in respect of AY 2015-16 accepting the petitioners’ claim. The view proposed to be adopted in the impugned re-assessments is thus a deviation, an aberration so to say, from the regular and consistent view taken by the Income Tax Department in regard to this issue. The expenditures incurred on Programme/film rights have been found to be revenue in nature and the stand of the assessee accepted. Thus, quite apart from the fact that as rejected the legal arguments put forth by the respondent to support the impugned proceedings, they are also found to be contrary to the settled principles of consistency. The principle of res judicata would not apply in matters of assessment under the Income tax Act, as each assessment year is separate and distinct, to be looked into independently and without reference to other years. Be that as it may, it is too well settled that there should be no deviation with respect to a consistent view except where such deviation is justified in law or on facts. As far as the present matters are concerned, there is no dispute that the view of the Department has remained consistent through the years, except for the assessment years before me now. Supreme Court in the case of PARASHURAM POTTERY WORKS CO. LIMITED VERSUS ITO [1976 (11) TMI 1 - SUPREME COURT] held that income-tax assessment orders are concerned, they cannot be reopened on the scope of income escaping assessment u/s 147 after the expiry of four years from the end of the assessment year unless there be omission or failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment. - Decided in favour of assessee.
|