Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + HC Central Excise - 2019 (12) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (12) TMI 940 - HC - Central ExcisePower of review of its own order by High Court - error apparent on the face of record or not - clandestine manufacturing and supply of scented tobacco to various manufactures - Review is sought for on the ground that Mr. Devi Prasad Pande, Partner of M/s Sarita Roadways has stated in his statement before the authority that he transported the scented tobacco to M/s. RS Industries and M/s. RS Company, which shows that both are the same companies, therefore, slight change in their name becomes insignificant. HELD THAT:- There is no error apparent on the face of the record warranting review. The Apex Court in the case of HARIDAS DAS VERSUS SMT. USHA RANI BANIK & ORS [2006 (3) TMI 686 - SUPREME COURT] where it was held that Perusal of the Order XLVII, Rule 1 shows that review of a judgment or an order could be sought: (a) from the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which after exercise of due diligence was not within the knowledge of the applicant; (b) such important matter or evidence could not be produced by the applicant at the time when the decree was passed or order made; (c) on account of some mistake or error apparent on the face of record or any other sufficient reason. The Apex Court has held that rehearing of a case can be done on account of some mistake or an error apparent on the face of the record or for any other sufficient reason - In the present case, there is no error apparent on the face of the record and the petitioner in fact under the guise of review is challenging the order passed by this Court, which is under review. There are no reason to review the order - review petition dismissed.
|