Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2020 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (1) TMI 443 - AT - Income TaxDisallowance of salaries paid to expatriate employees of the assessee - “head office expenses” within the meaning of Section 44C - AO observed that the said expenditure was not debited by the assessee to the profit and loss account and the expatriate employees were not on the pay roll of the Indian branch. - Held that:- the issue raised by the revenue in this appeal stands covered in favour of the assessee by the various cited decisions. Therefore, following the principal of consistency, claim of deduction allowed. Expenses incurred for mobilization of deposits from non-resident Indian - The assessee submitted that these expenses were incurred by their head office and since the deposits were retained in the books of Indian branch, the related expenses incurred thereon are also debited to the Indian branch. The assessee has specifically submitted that these expenses are in the nature of salaries, travelling, advertisement and other incidental expenses - Held that:- following the earlier decision [2015 (11) TMI 1792 - ITAT MUMBAI], decided in favor of assessee. Exchange Gain/Loss in valuation of outstanding Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts - Held that:- The ld. CIT(A) appreciated the contentions of the assessee and directed that this sum should be taxed only in the year in which the said forward contracts gets matured i.e. in A.Y.2003-04. The ld. CIT(A) also directed the ld. AO to grant deduction, being the loss arising on account of valuation of outstanding forward contracts as on 31/03/2001 as the same is to be allowed even as per analogy of the ld. AO. - Order of CIT(A) sustained. Transfer pricing adjustment - Correspondent Banking Activities - Held that:- when services are rendered free of charge to the AE by the assessee and similarly AE also provided reciprocal services free of charge to the assessee, there cannot be any reason for doubting the said transaction or make any transfer pricing adjustment thereon as both the assessee as well as the AEs are part of global conglomerate. The assessee had considerably benefitted out of earning income from Indian FIs and float income pursuant to correspondent banking activities and the said benefit directly flows to the assessee. The main business transactions have been accepted to be at arm’s length and hence, the ld. TPO cannot separately treat the incidental benefit as a separate transaction unless it is shown that they are separate from the main business activities. Allocation of cost and mark up thereon - Held that:- Though we find lot of force in the aforesaid argument of the ld. AR, in any case, the nature of services are such that they are reciprocal in nature and hence, there cannot be any attribution of mark up on the same. Hence, we hold that no mark up should be loaded on the attribution of costs towards incidental marketing activities undertaken by the assessee in connection with the correspondent banking activities. No transfer pricing adjustment on account of correspondent banking activity is warranted in the instant case. - Decided in favor of assessee. Services provided by employees of the bank to overseas AEs - TPO applied TNMM as the MAM with net cost plus as the profit level indicator. - Held that:- in case of certain employees, the assessee had suo-moto not claimed deduction of proportionate salary pertaining to services provided to foreign AEs. Hence, the same cannot be subject matter of consideration while making TP adjustment as it would lead to double disallowance. In any case, these employees render liasoning and coordination of services at group level as a mere incidental activity and the same need not be even considered as separate international transaction warranting any benchmarking thereon. - Additions deleted. TP adjustments in relation to support services in relation to External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs). - The ld. TPO observed that the arm’s length price in respect of services rendered for continuing ECB transactions is required to be worked out because the overseas branch is helped by a local branch for the documentation, collecting fees, ensuring smooth and timely payment of interest etc., and credit review and monitoring of performance, monitoring of breach of covenants, monitoring of assets, co-ordination with other banks, lenders to clients under syndication and preparation of watch list report. - Held that:- The said receipt of fee / commission income has been accepted to be at arm’s length. Hence, there is no question of further fee that is required for the assessee in respect of continuing ECBs. We find that the ld. CIT(A) had categorically observed that HSBC India does not assume any risk in respect of continuing ECBs compared to the nature of service rendered by them.- No additions.
|