Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2020 (10) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (10) TMI 181 - AT - CustomsLevy of penalty - late filing to bill of entry - import of “Stearic Acid” which was partially exempted as per Notification No.12/12-Customs dated 17.03.2012 (Sr. No. 230A), till the amendment of tariff from 30.06.2017 - HELD THAT:- Though the importer is required to present the bill of entry before the end of the next day following the day (excluding holidays) on which the Aircraft or Vessel or Vehicle carrying the goods arrives at a Customs station at which such goods are to be cleared for home consumption or warehousing. However, as per sub regulation (2), it is provided that the penalty for late presentation of bill of entry shall be liable to be paid, if there was no sufficient cause for delay in filing the bill of entry. In the present case entire event from time of import till the filing of bill of entry is known to the Custom Department that the appellant intended to claim the exemption notification but due to apparent error in the notification, the appellant was not in a position to file the bill of entry on EDI System - Since, the appellant had strong belief that they are entitled for exemption Notification, they followed up the matter with the Customs, however, the Customs Official knowingly that the goods is exempted insisted the appellant to file bill of entry and pay the entire custom duty and the later they can claim the refund. Once it is admitted that the goods are exempted no any business person would pay the custom duty and clear the goods and this is the reason the appellant were reluctant to file the bill of entry. However, since the Customs Official did not clear the goods under exemption, the appellant had no option but to file bill of entry without claiming the exemption notification. This entire episode is a sufficient cause for delay in filing the bill of entry, therefore, invoking the sub-regulation-(2) of regulation 4, no charges for late presentation of bill of entry should have been demanded from the appellant - the appellant has made out a fit case for non-imposition of charges for late presentation of bill of entry. Accordingly, the charges paid for late filing of bill of entry is refundable to the appellant. Appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant.
|