Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2021 (8) TMI AAR This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2021 (8) TMI 837 - AAR - GSTValidity of Advance ruling - Obtaining ruling by suppression of facts - Investigation proceedings were pending - Ruling in IN RE: M/S. SHALBY LIMITED, [2021 (4) TMI 557 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT] - Validity of Sr. No 17 of subject Application FORM GST ARA-01 filed on 2.12.2020 for obtaining the Advance Ruling - whether the stated Advance Ruling may be declared Void Abinitio under Section 104, CGST Act or otherwise? - HELD THAT:- The Questions raised in Advance Ruling Application dated 2-12-20 and the issue pending vide Investigation initiated vide Section 70(1) and three GST DRC-01A Part A all dated 11-2-20 are the same - the applicant was aware of the investigation initiated and the proceedings initiated vide three GST DRC-01A Part A all dated 11-2-20. Yet it chose not to declare the same in the Advance Ruling Application dated 2-12-20 and mis-declared at said Sr. No. 17 Form GST ARA-01 dated 2-12-2020 of the said application. We notice that even the Revenue did not bring this misdeclaration by the applicant before the Authority prior to issuance of Ruling dated 20-1-21. However this does not shirk away the responsibility cast on the applicant. The matter at present is not appeal issue as prescribed at section 100 of CGST Act, but the matter at hand to decide whether the Ruling may be declared void abinitio as prescribed at section 104 of the CGST Act. The Authority has been empowered vide Section 104 of CGST Act to declare a Ruling void abinitio. We hold that the Advance Ruling cannot be used as a mechanism to nullify and frustrate the inquiry proceedings already initiated vide section 70(1) of CGST Act. The applicant should bear in mind that the CGST Act has deemed this Authority to be a civil court for the purposes of section 195, but not for the purposes of Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and every proceeding before the Authority shall be deemed to be judicial proceeding within the meaning of sections 193 and 228, and for the purpose of section 196 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant has obtained said Advance Ruling dated 20-1-21 by suppressing the material facts. It is declared that Advance Ruling in IN RE: M/S. SHALBY LIMITED, [2021 (4) TMI 557 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT] is void ab-initio in terms of Section 104 of CGST Act.
|