Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2022 (1) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (1) TMI 100 - HC - Indian LawsDishonor of Cheque - insufficient funds - legally enforceable debt or not - acquittal of the accused - appellant collecting interest at 24% with monthly compounding, is correct or not - HELD THAT:- The account statement produced as Ext.P10 would clearly indicate that every month interest was being added to the principal and the interest for the next month was calculated on the entire amount, including the previous arrears and the interest already added during the previous month. This method of computation is completely different from imposing penal interest upon an installment amount which contain interest element. There are no doubt that the method of computation adopted by the appellant herein is amounting to compounding of interest. In such circumstances, the finding of the trial court cannot be interfered with. As rightly found by the trial court, none of the documents produced in support of the case of the appellant provide for compounding interest to be collected from the accused person. Even as per the Ext.P11 promissory note and also as per the evidence of PW1 what was permissible is interest at the rate of 24% per annum. However, the cheque amount which tallies the final figure as shown in Ext.P10 account statement includes interest at compounding rates which was not authorised even as per the evidence adduced by the appellant himself. In such circumstances, the amount specified in Ext.P1 cheque cannot be treated as a legally enforceable debt so as to attract offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Appeal dismissed - decided against appellant.
|