Home Case Index All Cases Money Laundering Money Laundering + HC Money Laundering - 2022 (5) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (5) TMI 1362 - HC - Money LaunderingCondonation of delay of 204 days in filing appeal - sufficient reasons for condonation provided or not - HELD THAT:- There is sufficient explanation for not filing the appeal within the prescribed period. It is also informed by learned counsel for the Appellant that RC in the CBI Court and proceedings before the Enforcement Directorate involving the same transactions are pending. In Tata Yodogawa Ltd. [1988 (9) TMI 53 - SUPREME COURT], the Supreme Court had considered the application seeking condonation of delay wherein it was contended by the Appellants therein that the “legal problem in filing the special leave petitions arose” and the Supreme Court despite opportunities being given found that the Appellant had failed to explain as to what was the legal problem which had caused the delay. In view of the facts of the case, as also the explanation rendered for the delay, it is opined that Appellant has sufficiently explained the delay for not filing the appeal within the prescribed period - Application seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal is allowed.
|