Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2022 (12) TMI 569 - AT - Income TaxAddition on account of expenditure as paid/credited in F.Y. 2010-11 but was accrued/became due during F.Y. 2009-10 - HELD THAT - It is emerges from the material on record that the assessee was maintaining books of accounts which being duly audited by expert i.e. Chartered Accountant. The report of the chartered accountant has been furnished before the A.O. At the time of assessment proceedings AO has disallowed the expenditure only on the ground that it has been claimed as prior period expenditure although the assessee was following the merchandise system of the accounting. A.O has not of the opinion that the expenditure itself is bogus per se. The expenditure has been incurred for the business and it is not the case of the A.O that it is not allowable u/s 37 (1) - Since the assessee has already paid more tax in Financial Year 2009-10 which is in the tax bracket of 30% and the claim is revenue neutral i.e. that is there is no loss of Revenue. While deleting the addition made by the A.O Ld.CIT(A) has also considered all the above facts. Therefore we do not find any reason to interfere with the finding of the facts by the CIT(A) and also the conclusion arrived by the Ld.CIT(A). Therefore the order of Ld. CIT(A) which requires no interference. Accordingly we inclined to dismiss the Revenue s Grounds of Appeal.
|