Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser Register to get Live Demo
2023 (5) TMI 925 - HC - GSTPrinciples of natural justice - ex-parte assessment order - evasion of tax - demand of CGST, SGST, interest and penalty - HELD THAT:- Loose papers were in respect of duty chart of the employees. There was no detail of inward supply and outward supply in the loose paper and, therefore, the appellate authority was of the view that because of these loose papers, no solid conclusion can be drawn. The petitioner had accepted before the appellate authority that in the financial year concerned, he had received the taxable amount Rs. 43,75,059.46/- on which, he had paid Rs. 3,70,229/- each for State G.S.T. and Central G.S.T. From the entries, as found in the diary recovered by the Special Investigation Branch, it was noticed that the petitioner had received much more advance than it was shown in the returns. From the documents recovered from the resort by the Special Investigation Branch, it was noticed that the petitioner had received Rs.17,95,000/-, whereas in the return he has shown advance of Rs. 3,73,983.05/- only. The appellate authority had assessed the tax amount of Rs. 1,80,000/- each for State G.S.T. and Central G.S.T., penalty amount of Rs. 3,60,000/- and interest amount of Rs. 3,19,320/- total amount of Rs. 10,39,320/- liability against the petitioner. Against the assessed amount of Rs.48,96,000/-, the Appellate Authority has reduced amount of Rs 38,56,680/- - there are no substance in the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the assessment order is based on presumption. The appellate authority has examined each and every document submitted by the petitioner as well as the documents recovered by the Special Investigation Branch. There are no error in the impugned order - petition dismissed.
|