Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AAR Customs - 2023 (6) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (6) TMI 657 - AAR - Customs


Issues Involved:

1. Classification of "Interactive Display System (View Board)" under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

Summary:

Issue 1: Classification of Interactive Display System (View Board) under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975:

The applicant, M/s. Brightpoint India Pvt. Ltd., sought an advance ruling on the classification of various models of "Interactive Display System (View Board)" under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The applicant argued that the subject goods, which include Liquid Crystal Display panels with LED backlight, in-built CPU and RAM, pre-installed Android 7.0 operating system, and other advanced features, qualify as "Automatic Data Processing Machines" (ADPMs) and should be classified under Chapter heading 8471, specifically sub-heading 84714190.

The applicant emphasized that the subject goods meet all the criteria specified in Note 5(A) to Chapter 84, which defines ADPMs. They argued that the goods are capable of storing and executing programs, being freely programmed, performing arithmetical computations, and executing processing programs without human intervention. They also contended that the goods should not be classified under Chapter 8528, which covers monitors and projectors, as the subject goods have functionalities beyond mere display.

The jurisdictional Commissioner of Customs, Chennai-II (Import), opposed the applicant's classification under Chapter heading 8471, arguing that the primary function of the goods is display and interaction, making them more akin to monitors. They suggested classification under sub-heading 8528 5900, which deals with other monitors. The Commissionerate cited various legal precedents and Chapter Notes to support their stance.

Upon review, the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) examined the features and functionalities of the subject goods, noting that they possess an in-built CPU, Android operating system, and high internal storage capacity. The AAR concluded that the subject goods meet all the requirements of Note 5(A) to Chapter 84, qualifying them as ADPMs. The AAR also determined that the goods are not merely display devices but perform a plethora of functions independently, making them more than just monitors.

The AAR ruled that the subject goods, "Interactive Display System (View Board)," merit classification under Heading 8471 and more specifically under sub-heading 84714190 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates