Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2023 (8) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (8) TMI 756 - HC - CustomsSeeking directions on the respondent-Authorities to permit the vessel to sail out of the Haldia Anchorage for discharging cargo at Tuticorin, another destination - perishable goods - Customs Authorities have raised any claim against the petitioner to justify the withholding of permission to the petitioner’s vessel to leave the Haldia Dock Complex or not - HELD THAT:- The refusal to grant permission to the petitioner to leave the Sandheads of Haldia and/or the anchorage of the Haldia Dock Complex are entirely misplaced and de hors the law. It is required to be mentioned here that Section 30 of the Act empowers the issuance of Import Manifest. Although there is no specific provision in the Act for cancellation of the same, it is well-settled that in the absence of power of cancellation having been vested in the authorities, the same has to be read into the powers of the issuing authority. The delivery of import manifest or import report and issuance of the same, since it takes place under Section 30, the power of cancellation of the same under appropriate conditions has to be read into the said Section as well - The Bills of Entry are to be proceeded on by the importer. Since they themselves gave ‘no objections’ permitting the cargo to be sold elsewhere, thus giving a go-bye to the goods being imported through Haldia, there is no bar to the Bills of Entry elapsing or being cancelled. Since there is no other allegation of any violation of law or any claims of dues or charges made by the Customs Authorities till date against the petitioner, and as the shipping agent and all importers have been impleaded in the present writ petition and have issued their consent by way of ‘no objections’, there cannot be any further impediment of releasing the vessel of the petitioner. In the present case, in any event, the Customs officials have not claimed any import duty from the petitioner till date. The ground of refusal was mere pendency of certain Bills of entry which have been waived by the importers themselves, by way of their no objections - In the present case, it is undisputed that the goods have not been put into the course of home consumption or warehousing and are still on board the petitioner’s vessel. Hence, the status of the goods is admitted. The ‘no objections’ given by the importers have also not been challenged, despite service of notice of the writ petition on the importers. Hence, it cannot be argued that the said Clause overrides the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 itself or creates any embargo on the petitioner to remove its vessel from the Haldia Dock Anchorage. The respondent nos. 2 to 5 are directed to take immediate steps for issuing necessary permit for the petitioner’s vessel M.V. Dariya Ganga to sail out of the Haldia Anchorage for her present location, that is, the Tuticorin Port or elsewhere - petition allowed.
|