Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2023 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (9) TMI 421 - AT - CustomsRevocation of CB license - forfeiture of security deposit - levy of penalty - allegation is that the appellants have processed the shipping bills without proper antecedent verification of exporters by using any reliable means, even after knowing that the export goods belong to a third person, other than the exporter - HELD THAT:- The Regulations and the Board’s circular provide that certain specific features of an importer/ exporter needs to be verified in terms of specified documents mentioned in Annexure to the said Circular dated 08.04.2010, in order to fulfill the obligations by a Customs Broker. In the present case, it is also on record that the export entities being proprietorship firms, the particulars regarding the legal name of the exporter firms and their addresses have been verified by the CB on the basis of specified documents. In this regard, we also refer to the Public Notice No.26/2019 dated 14.10.2019 issued by the Commissioner of Customs (Export), Air Cargo Complex informing the trade that the public notices issued in respect of ‘verification of documents in respect of first time of import of goods’ is mutatis mutandis applicable to ‘first time export goods’ also. The appellants CB in this case cannot be held responsible in cases where they have verified the identity of the exporter through prescribed records. Further, in the present case the appellants have also obtained the first time export verification of the exporters conducted by the appropriate customs authorities and a specific approval has been given by the Competent Authority and the same has been communicated by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs, DC, stating that the exporters/Customs Broker is allowed to initiate for the first time import/export through Precious Cargo Customs Clearance Centre having Customs-EDI port code INDPC4. Thus, the conclusion arrived at by the Principal Commissioner in the impugned order to the extent that the appellants have violated in not fulfilling the obligation cast on them under Sub-regulation 10(n) is not legally sustainable. There are no merits in the impugned order passed by the learned Principal Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai in revoking the license of the appellants and directing them to surrender the original customs broker license as well as ordering for forfeiture of the entire security deposit furnished by the appellants customs broker - the impugned order is justifiable to the limited extent of imposition of penalty of Rs.50,000/- against them - appeal allowed in favour of the appellants.
|