Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (10) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (10) TMI 129 - AT - Income TaxAllowability of expenditure on service tax liability - AO held that payment of service tax is covered under section 43B of the Income Tax Act and same is allowable in the year of payment only - HELD THAT:- The impugned service Tax liability was actually paid by the Assessee in FY 2014-15. As per Section 43B and as per the law enunciated by Hon’ble SC Maruti Suzuki India Ltd [2020 (2) TMI 376 - SUPREME COURT] the amount of deduction is available only when it is actually paid during the year irrespective of the accrual of actual liability as per the relevant statute. The assessee had claimed that the Liability was not crystallized in FY 2014-15 and assessee paid the amount under protest. Assessee claimed that the impugned service Tax Liability was crystallized only in F.Y.2015-16 after the Order of Pr. Commissioner Service Tax Pune dated 30/10/2015. Service Tax Liability arises when the services are performed. The impugned services were actually performed in financial years prior to F.Y.2015-16. There is no dispute about these facts. Superintendent of Central Excise & Service Tax had passed the order in F.Y.2014-15 directing the assessee to pay the Service Tax for the Services provided from July, 2012 to March, 2014. Therefore, the liability to pay the service Tax had arisen in earlier financial years and the contention of the assessee is rejected that the demand was not crystallized. Thus, in the case of United Glass Manufacturing CO [2012 (9) TMI 914 - SUPREME COURT] allowed deduction u/s 43B, of Sales tax paid on estimate basis. Therefore, no merit in the argument of the assessee that the Liability of Service Tax was not crystallized during F.Y.2014-15 and it was crystallized only in F.Y.2015-16, though the Service Tax amounts were paid in F.Y.2014-15. In this case since the amount was not paid during the F.Y. 2015-16, but it was actually paid in F.Y.2014-15 and earlier years the AO has rightly disallowed the impugned amount as un-allowable expenditure u/s. 43B of the Act for A.Y.2016-17.Therefore, in these facts and circumstances of the case we agree with the AO and upheld the disallowance. Decided against assessee.
|