Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2023 (10) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (10) TMI 323 - AT - CustomsClassification of imported goods - to be classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 8517 7010 as claimed by the appellants or classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 8517 62 90 as contended by the Department? - HELD THAT:- The government had provided concessional rate of basic customs duty of 10% on all products covered under the scope of tariff item 8517 6290 or 8517 6990, except for eight specified products specified therein. These include Optical Transport Network (OTN) products under entry 20(d). The said exemption notification does not perse provide for any aid for classification of goods. Hence, the conclusion arrived at by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order for excluding the classification of the imported goods under CTH 8517 7010 and for deciding the classification under CTH 8517 6290 on the basis of entries under exemption notification, cannot be agreed upon. It is a settled law that while statutory notifications may be looked at for the purpose of ascertaining the scope of goods covered under the exemption notification, they cannot be used to determine the classification of goods. The Co-ordinate Bench in the case of COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) MUMBAI VERSUS M/S RELIANCE JIO INFOCOM LTD [2019 (11) TMI 451 - CESTAT MUMBAI] had dealt with the product ‘antenna’ used with Base Transmission Station (BTS) for mobile telecommunication network, in which the matter is shown as pending in the Apex Court; whereas, in the case in hand, it is dealt with ‘interface cards’, whose features are entirely different than the products dealt with by the Co-ordinate Bench. Hence, the ratio of the judgement of Co-ordinate Bench does not apply to the facts of this case. The decision of the Tribunal in the case of COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS-MUMBAI (AIR CARGO IMPORT) AND COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS-MUMBAI (ACC) VERSUS RELIANCE JIO INFOCOMM LTD. [2022 (6) TMI 1051 - CESTAT MUMBAI] deals with classification of ‘cards i.e., Populated Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs)’ incorporated in photonic service switch. Thus, the imported goods in the present case ‘interface cards’ being functionally similar, the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal, which has been upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) VERSUS M/S. RELIANCE JIO INFOCOMM LTD. [2023 (1) TMI 1297 - SC ORDER], by holding that they do not think it is appropriate to interfere in the impugned order, is relevant to the present case. Thus, on the basis of the decision of the Tribunal which was upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the impugned order is not sustainable. Appeal allowed.
|