Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2023 (11) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (11) TMI 705 - HC - Income TaxCertificate of deduction of lower tax u/s 197(1) - mandation of recording satisfaction determining the existing and estimated liability of an Assessee - Claim rejected on the ground that the petitioner has not filed Returns for the four years preceding the subject financial year i.e., 2023-24 - Whether the respondent’s rejection of the petitioner’s application by the impugned order is based on “satisfaction” that is contemplated under Section 197(1) of the IT Act ? - HELD THAT:- The provisions of Section 197(1) of the IT Act stipulate that where tax [at the rates in force under the different provisions mentioned therein] on the income of ‘any person’, or a sum payable to ‘any person’, is required to be deducted at the time of credit or at the time of payment as the case may be, the Assessing Officer, on an application made by an Assessee, shall give a Certificate, as may be appropriate, if satisfied that the total income of a recipient justifies no deduction of income tax or the deduction of income tax at any lower rate. Assessing Officer, in view of the provisions of Rule 28AA (1) of the IT Rules, must record satisfaction as contemplated under Section 197(1) of the IT Act determining the existing and estimated liability of an Assessee taking into consideration [a] tax payable or estimated income of the previous year relevant to the assessment year, [b] tax payable on the assessed or returned or estimated income as the case may be for the four previous years, [c] the existing liability under the IT Act or Wealth Tax Act 1957, and advanced tax payment, and [d] tax deducted at source and tax collected at source for the assessment year relevant to the previous year till the date of making an application. AO u/s 197(1) of the IT Act will have to be satisfied objectively that the total income of a recipient justifies either deduction at a rate lower than the rates mentioned in the provisions of Section 197(1) of the IT Act or that no deduction is necessary. This objective satisfaction must be based on the determination of the existing and the estimated liability, and the estimated liability and income will have to be determined considering the details mentioned in Rule 28AA (2) of the IT Rules. AO must also be satisfied that issuance of Certificate while convenient to the Assessee will not adversely affect the Revenue’s interest. If the Assessing Officer, only upon examination of the circumstances mentioned in Rules 28AA of the IT Rules, is satisfied based on the estimated income and liability justifies a Certificate for either deduction of income tax at a rate lower than the prescribed rate or no deduction of the income tax, the Certificate must be issued. This would be the true import of the expression that the Assessing Officer shall on an application give such Certificate as may be appropriate and therefore, the liability of another entity, even if it is the sister concern, would be extraneous. This Court is of the considered view that, without expressing any opinion on whether the petitioner’s explanation must prevail resulting in a Certificate under Section 197 of the IT Act, the petition must be disposed of quashing the impugned order dated 28.02.2023 restoring the application for reconsideration within a time frame. The petition is allowed in part and the respondent’s impugned order is quashed restoring the petitioner’s application to the respondent for reconsideration.
|