Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2023 (12) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (12) TMI 814 - HC - Income TaxCharacterization of income - income arising from sub-licensing of shops and establishment along with the various services which are rendered to the sub-licensed shopkeepers - house property or business income - Whether it can be treated as income from house property liable to be assessed u/s 22 or composite income arising from part exploitation of shops and establishment which are sub-leased as commercial assets and the services which are rendered to the shopkeepers can be treated as income arising from business falling under Section 28 of the Act? - HELD THAT:- The appellant assessee has obtained 5665 sqft. of space under a leave and licence-agreement dated 25.04.1972 from EIH Limited and has sub-licensed the space to several persons under a sub-licence agreement, along with certain services as aforementioned and for that received a composite amount as consideration on monthly basis. The assessee claimed that the sum received by it for sub-licensing, is business income but the assessing officer has not accepted it and taxed the receipts as income from house property. CIT (Appeal) allowed the appeal of the assessee and held the income to be income from business. The ITAT, after referring to section 27 (iiib) of the Income Tax Act defining the term “deemed owner” and Section 269UA(f) of the Act defining the word “transfer”; held that the income derived by the assessee is “Income from House Property.” While coming to the aforesaid conclusion, the ITAT has committed a manifest error of law to ignore the object and business activity of the appellant assessee company, and misunderstood the nature of transaction of sub-license.. Thus, as per Memorandum of Association the object of the assessee company ancillary to the main object is to acquire on licence premises suitable for housing, accommodating shops, boutiques, stores, offices, showrooms for the purpose of making available on the basis of lease or licence and sub-lisence. The Assessing Officer himself recorded a specific finding in the Assessment Order that during the previous year relevant to the assessment year in question the assessee was engaged in the business of real estate and its income mainly consisted from contribution from shops. Since the object of the assessee company and its activity is the business of renting/lisencing/sub-lisencing shops etc. and it derived income mainly from the aforesaid business activity, therefore, the income from contribution/sub-lisencing derived by the assessee is business income and not income from house property. The law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Chennai Properties and Investment Ltd. [2015 (5) TMI 46 - SUPREME COURT] and Royla Corporation Private Limited [2016 (8) TMI 522 - SUPREME COURT] are applicable on facts of the present case. Hence, we hold that the income in question of the appellant assessee is business income and not income from house property. Except for the assessment order in question, the appellant assessee’s income from sub-letting/sub-licensing the space in question, has always been accepted by the respondent Income Tax Department as, income from business. Under the circumstances when the respondent Income Tax Department has always accepted the income of the appellant assessee from sub-licensing/sub-letting of the space in question, to be income from business, then the respondent cannot take a contrary stand in the present appeal. Assessee appeal allowed.
|