Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2024 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (2) TMI 210 - AT - CustomsLevy of penalty on Customs Broker - Forfeiture of the security deposit - Role of the employee of the CB - illegal export of prohibited goods - allegations pertaining to Regulation 10(a), 10(e) and 10(n) of CBLR, 2018 - Doctrine of proportionality - HELD THAT:- There appears to be no doubt that fraud has been committed by manipulating the documents to enable the illegal export of prohibited goods but there is no evidence to say that the appellant connived or was aware of the modus-operandi. However, it cannot be ignore that by virtue of a license granted under the Regulations, a customs broker is eligible and entitle to carry on the work of clearance of goods for import and export. As laid down in various decisions, CHA occupies a very important position in the Customs House. He is supposed to safeguard the interests of both the importers and the Customs and therefore a lot of trust is kept in CHA by the importers or exporters as well as by the NOBLE AGENCY VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI [2002 (2) TMI 171 - CEGAT, MUMBAI]. Therefore, the appellant when he admits that he did not verify the address of the exporting company as they were in Amritsar and also did not raise any query for non production of the authorization from the exporter company had violated the obligations cast on a customs broker under the Regulations. Considering the extent of violation that can be attributed to the appellant and the fact noted by the Commissioner that active role was played by Shri Kumod Kumar Choudhary, employee of the CB and role of CB has not come out anywhere in the investigation as also CB has taken immediate action against the employee, applying the doctrine of proportionality the forfeiture of security deposit is far beyond proportion and imposition of penalty of Rs. 50,000/- is sufficient. The impugned order is modified to the extent that forfeiture of the security deposit needs to be set aside and only the order whereby the penalty has been imposed is affirmed - appeal allowed in part. Revocation of Customs Broker License - Revenue appeal for not revoking the License - Held that:- We do not find that the appellant had any knowledge that illegal exports were attempted or there was any active or passive facilitation on the part of the appellant. There was no finding of any mala fide on the part of CHA such that trust operating between CHA and customs authorities was violated or irritably lost for future operation of the license. - Revenue appeal dismissed.
|