Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2024 (2) TMI 357 - HC - GSTViolation of principles of natural justice - although the notice that preceded the impugned order was sent by the respondent on the common portal was received by the petitioner the petitioner was unaware of the same - Recovery of input tax credit alongwith interest and penalty - HELD THAT - Section 169 of the respective GST enactments is a progressive provision intended to integrate technology with the assessment proceedings under the provisions of the respective GST Enactments. Section 169 of the respective GST Enactment is a step to modernize the tax administration in the country by taking advantage of available technology. At the same time the Court cannot loose sight of the fact that although there is advancement in the technology and it is omnipresent everywhere and Section 169(1)(c) of the respective GST Enactments has statutorily recognized communication through e-mail all men of commerce from the business community particularly small traders small service provider and small manufacturers may not be ready to receive and respond. They may be technologically challenged which may impair them to respond autonomously to emails sent to them in the dash board of GST Web portal on their computer screen or Tab or smart phones. As a matter of prudence it is advisable for the department to serve notice on such assessees through other mode of communications prescribed when they fail to respond to the summons orders notices and other communications etc. sent to them through email under Section 169 (1) (c) of the respective GST Enactments - there has to be some amount of flexibility. Rigidity in the administration of tax in such matters may not serve the purpose and can be counter productive. There has to be a proper communication as otherwise exparte decisions are susceptible to be successfully challenged and declared as arbitrary for violation of principles of natural justice. The impugned order is set aside and the case is remitted back to the respondent to pass a fresh order on merits in accordance with law preferably within a period of 45 days from date of receipt of this order - Petition allowed.
|