Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2024 (2) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (2) TMI 467 - HC - Income TaxReopening of assessment - notice issued after the expiry of more than 4 years - reasons to believe - allegation of details picked up from the assessment records - claim of interest income being capitalised to work in progress - HELD THAT:- As bare perusal of the reasons recorded indicates that all details mentioned therein have been picked up from the assessment records. There can be no failure on the part of petitioner to truly and fully disclose all material facts. The reasons recorded also alleged that the claim of interest income being capitalised to work in progress or claim of provision made for income tax was not considered during the course of assessment proceedings and hence no opinion was formed by the assessing officer in this respect. To the petition is annexed a copy which shows that during the year under consideration petitioner has incurred interest expenditure of Rs. 33,06,72,763/- and earned interest income of Rs. 5,61,89,376/- and the treatment of those figures in the accounts of petitioner were subject matter of consideration. It is true that these issues have not been specifically discussed in the original assessment order dated 29th February 2016. But in the assessment order, the assessing officer has reworked the work in progress, which indicates that these issues were certainly subject matter of consideration during the assessment proceedings. As held by the Division Bench of this Court in Aroni Commercials Ltd. [2014 (2) TMI 659 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] the settled law is once a query is raised during the assessment proceedings and the assessee has replied to it, it follows that the query raised was a subject of consideration of the AO while completing the assessment. It is not necessary that an assessment order should contain reference and/or discussion to disclose its satisfaction in respect of the query raised. The only requirement is that the AO ought to have considered, the objection now raised in the grounds for issuing notice under Section 148 of the Act, during the original assessment proceedings. In the case at hand, the AO having raised a query and the petitioner having replied to it, it follows that the query raised was subject of consideration of the AO while passing the assessment order - In our view, the re-opening of assessment by the impugned notice is merely on the basis of change of opinion of the AO from that held earlier during the course of assessment proceedings and this change of opinion does not constitute justification and/or reasons to believe that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Decided in favour of assessee.
|