Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2000 (12) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2000 (12) TMI 173 - CEGAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......inding, we have not considered the arguments on limitation. 10.It will then follow that no duty was leviable, since the goods fall under heading 89.05 (sic) being to subject to nil rate of duty, or penalty imposable on either of the appellants. 11.Both appeals are allowed, and the impugned order set aside. Consequential relief, if permitted by law.
|