Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2002 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2002 (3) TMI 114 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHIExtract: .......voluntarily paid the differential duty on the enhanced price, the Commissioner was right in holding that there was no suppression of facts and the requirements of Section 11AB were not satisfied. Therefore, we find no error in the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner. 5. In the result, there is no merit in the appeal and the same is rejected.
|