Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2005 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2005 (2) TMI 413 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: ....... requirement of Rule 173G(e) in view of the judgment of the Hon ble High Court, Mumbai. Therefore, there was no violation of the rule and penalty was not attracted. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed, after setting aside the impugned order. The appellant shall be entitled to consequential relief, if any. (Pronounced and dictated in the open Court).
|