9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Addition to trading account in cement. 2. Addition to trading account in diesel. 3. Addition to trading account in kerosene. 4. Disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the IT Act, 1961. Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Addition to Trading Account in Cement: The Income Tax Officer (ITO) added Rs. 14,851 to the trading account for cement, citing a discrepancy between the purchase figures provided by the assessee and the invoices from India Cements Ltd. The assessee's records showed 11,640 bags purchased, while the invoices indicated only 10,280 bags. The ITO attributed this to inflation in purchases. On appeal, the Assistant Appellate Commissioner (AAC) found a physical quantity tally but still sustained an addition of Rs. 10,000 for possible account manipulation. The tribunal concluded that the AAC's suspicion of qualitative discrepancies (e.g., splitting one bag into two) was unfounded in the context of cement, a controlled commodity. Since there was a physical quantity tally and no evidence of inflation or low gross profit rate, the tribunal deleted the Rs. 10,000 addition. 2. Addition to Trading Account in Diesel: The ITO added Rs. 46,396 to the trading account for diesel, based on a discrepancy between the assessee's purchase records (1208 K. Litres) and Indian Oil Corporation's records (1159 K. Litres). The AAC reduced this addition to Rs. 10,000, suspecting qualitative issues similar to the cement case. The tribunal found no basis for this addition, noting that diesel, like cement, cannot be easily adulterated or sold in short measures without detection. The tribunal emphasized that the ITO's addition was based solely on alleged inflation, which was not proven. Consequently, the Rs. 10,000 addition was deleted. 3. Addition to Trading Account in Kerosene: The ITO added Rs. 23,222 for kerosene, citing a discrepancy in purchase records. The AAC reduced this to Rs. 10,000, again suspecting qualitative issues. The tribunal noted that while kerosene could be adulterated or sold in short measures, any extra quantity would typically be sold outside the accounts. Since the AAC had ruled out purchase inflation and there was no evidence of qualitative discrepancies, the tribunal deleted the Rs. 10,000 addition. 4. Disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the IT Act, 1961: The AAC disallowed Rs. 23,856 for diesel purchases made in cash exceeding Rs. 2,500, which the ITO had not originally disallowed. The tribunal questioned the AAC's authority to initiate such a disallowance and noted that Section 40A(3) applies to specific expenditure items claimed as deductions. Since the assessee's accounts were rejected and the income was estimated under Section 145(2), the tribunal held that the disallowance under Section 40A(3) was inapplicable. The tribunal emphasized that the assessment was based on a reasonable profit estimate, not on specific expenditure items. Therefore, the Rs. 23,856 disallowance was deleted. Conclusion: The tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting all additions and disallowances made by the ITO and AAC.
|
