Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2006 (5) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2006 (5) TMI 151 - AT - Income TaxIncome Escaping Assessment - Validity Of notice issued u/s 148 - assessment completed u/s 143(3)/147 - whether conditions for reopening of assessment on second occasion did exist or not - Disallowance of provision for unexpired warranty. HELD THAT:- Admittedly, two notices u/s 148 have been issued in this case. From the copy of order sheet of assessment records for assessment year 1989-90 it is seen that Assessing Officer issued notice u/s 148 on 24-2-1993, which was despatched on 26-2-1993. The ld. AR of assessee has filed copy of notice u/s 148 dated 24-2-1993 in support of her contention that notice was issued and served on assessee. After issue of notice u/s 148, when no return is filed by the assessee, the Assessing Officer could have issued notice u/s 142(1) requiring the assessee to file return of income. No such action was taken. Ultimately the reassessment proceedings initiated got barred by limitation on 31-3-1995. The assessee has not produced any evidence to show that return of income was filed in response to notice u/s 148 dated 24-2-1993. Thus inaction on the part of Assessing Officer to complete assessment u/s 144 in the absence of return of income would not amount to forming of an opinion, that there was no escapement of income. When assessee has not filed a return of income, it is not correct on the part of assessee to say that Assessing Officer has formed an opinion in the reassessment proceedings initiated by issue of notice u/s 148 dated 24-2-1993. The Assessing Officer can issue any number of notices u/s 148 provided the conditions stipulated in. section 147 are satisfied and the same is within the period specified u/s 149 read with section 151. However, if an assessment is pending either by way of original assessment or by way of reassessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer cannot issue notice u/s 148. But if no proceedings are pending either by way of original assessment or by way of reassessment, he can issue notice u/s 148 within the time allowed under the Act. On the date of issue of second notice no reassessment proceedings were pending. The reassessment proceeding based on notice dated 24-2-1993 got barred by limitation on 31-3-1995. For assessment year under consideration assessment could have been reopened up to a period of ten years from the end of the assessment year 1989-90 as specified in section 149(1)(a)(iii) of the Act where income escaped was more than Rs. 1,00,000 or more. In this case condition precedent is satisfied and, therefore, in our considered view, the Assessing Officer was justified in reopening of the assessment. Disallowance of provision for unexpired warranty - In the case before us the assessee could not produce any basis on which the provision for warranty was determined. The actual expenditure incurred was at Rs. 2,80,131 as against the provision of Rs. 21,08,550. Therefore, it is clear that liability to the extent of Rs. 18,28,490 did not accrue. The provision was not made on actual quantification. Therefore, issue is covered against the assessee by the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Earth Movers Ltd. [2000 (8) TMI 4 - SUPREME COURT]. In our considered view the authorities below were justified in disallowing the claim of assessee as contingent liability. Thus, Appeal is dismissed.
|