2025 (4) TMI 980 - AT - Income Tax

Rejecting the application filed in Form No.10AB for registration u/sec. 80G - HELD THAT - The assessee has explained the reasons for not appearing before the CIT(E) and argued that if one more opportunity has been given the relevant details in support of it s application filed in Form No.10AB will be furnished to the satisfaction to the CIT(E). When the assessee is a Trust or Society registered u/sec. 12A of the Act the application filed for grant of exemption u/sec. 80G of the Act needs to be considered on merits. In the present case the CIT(E) rejected the application filed by the assessee for want of information. Since the assessee has explained the reasons for not filing the details as called for in our considered view one more opportunity of hearing needs to be given to the assessee to justify it s application filed in Form No.10AB. Thus we set aside the order of the CIT(E) and restore the issue back to the file of CIT(E) for re-consideration of the issue. The assessee is directed to file relevant information in support of it s application filed in Form No.10AB seeking for registration u/sec. 80G of the Act without seeking any adjournment under any pretext. Accordingly the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

- Whether the delay of 176 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal can be condoned.

- Whether the application filed by the assessee in Form No.10AB for registration under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was rightly rejected by the learned CIT(E) on the ground of non-furnishing of required information.

- Whether the assessee was given a fair opportunity to submit the relevant details and documents in support of the application for registration under section 80G.

- Whether the matter should be remitted back to the learned CIT(E) for reconsideration after providing the assessee an opportunity to furnish the required information.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Delay in Filing Appeal

The legal framework governing condonation of delay in filing appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is discretionary and requires the appellant to provide sufficient cause for the delay. The Court examined the affidavit filed by the assessee explaining the reasons for the delay of 176 days.

The Court's reasoning was that the explanation provided was satisfactory and justified the delay. The delay was condoned, allowing the appeal to be heard on merits. This is consistent with the principle that procedural delays should not bar substantive adjudication if sufficient cause is shown.

Rejection of Application under Section 80G

The relevant legal framework involves section 80G of the Income Tax Act, which provides for registration of entities eligible to receive donations qualifying for deduction. Registration under section 80G is contingent upon satisfying prescribed conditions and furnishing requisite documents such as Memorandum of Association or Trust Deed.

The assessee, already registered under section 12AA, filed Form No.10AB seeking registration under section 80G. The learned CIT(E) issued notices dated 27.10.2023 and 17.01.2024, calling for submission of documents and detailed replies. The assessee initially submitted some details but failed to respond to the subsequent show cause notice and did not appear for hearing.

The CIT(E) rejected the application on the ground of non-furnishing of required information. The Court noted that the assessee claimed a bona fide belief that the initial submission was sufficient and that the notice dated 17.01.2024 was not received, leading to non-compliance. The assessee only became aware of the rejection upon attempting to file the income tax return for the relevant assessment year.

The Court applied the principle that when an assessee is a Trust or Society registered under section 12A, the application for registration under section 80G must be considered on merits, and procedural fairness requires providing an opportunity to submit relevant information.

Opportunity to Furnish Information and Remand

The Court emphasized the need for fairness and the right to be heard. It observed that the rejection was primarily due to non-filing of information, which the assessee attributed to non-receipt of notice and misunderstanding. Given these circumstances, the Court held that the assessee should be granted one more opportunity to file the relevant documents and details in support of the application.

The Court set aside the order of the learned CIT(E) and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. It directed the assessee to furnish the required information without seeking any adjournment, ensuring expeditious disposal.

The Court balanced the competing arguments by acknowledging the CIT(E)'s duty to ensure compliance with procedural requirements while protecting the assessee's right to be heard and to present their case adequately.

3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

- "We are satisfied with the delay reasons explained by the assessee in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and accordingly, the delay of 176 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal is condoned and proceed the decide the appeal on merits."

- "When the assessee is a Trust or Society registered u/sec. 12A of the Act, the application filed for grant of exemption u/sec. 80G of the Act needs to be considered on merits."

- "Since the assessee has explained the reasons for not filing the details as called for, in our considered view, one more opportunity of hearing needs to be given to the assessee to justify its application filed in Form No.10AB."

- "Thus, we set aside the order of the learned CIT(E) and restore the issue back to the file of learned CIT(E) for re-consideration of the issue. The assessee is directed to file relevant information in support of its application filed in Form No.10AB seeking for registration u/sec. 80G of the Act without seeking any adjournment under any pretext."

Core principles established include the importance of procedural fairness in tax exemption registrations, the discretionary power to condone delays when justified, and the necessity to decide applications on merits rather than on procedural defaults without giving adequate opportunity to the applicant.

Final determinations were that the delay in filing appeal was condoned, the rejection of the application for registration under section 80G was set aside, and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after providing the assessee an opportunity to submit the required information.

← Previous Next →