Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1994 (8) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1994 (8) TMI 113 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......held that non-observance of former was condonable while that of the latter was not condonable. 6. emsp Considering that declaration in fact was filed and substantive benefit cannot be denied merely on account of technicality, I set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal. Since the appeal is allowed I am not going into the aspect of time bar.
|