Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1996 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1996 (3) TMI 261 - CEGAT, MADRASExtract: ....... cannot be a reason for denying the benefit under Rule 56C in this case. In view of the above, we find that inasmuch as there has been substantive compliance with the provisions of Rule 56C the appellants should be deemed to have operated within the purview of the said rule. In this view of the matter, we allow the appeal with consequential relief.
|