Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1972 (7) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1972 (7) TMI 24 - DELHI HIGH COURTCivil Suit - Interest On Refund - UOI did not press this issue. Otherwise also a suit cannot be dismissed merely on the ground that the plaintiffs have not given their addresses within the jurisdiction of the court as required by rule 3 of Chapter 3 of the Delhi High Court Rules. This omission can always be corrected - The learned counsel for the Union argued that CIT has not been made a party to the suit and, therefore, the suit is defective. I do not agree with this contention. It is not necessary to make the CIT a party to the suit. The suit is properly constituted as the Union of India has been made a party to the suit - For the reasons given above I hold that interest cannot be awarded to the plaintiffs by this court - In the result, the plaintiffs' suit is dismissed
|