Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1998 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1998 (9) TMI 241 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......xamined chemically in support of their contention. 5. emsp In view of these facts and circumstances, the Revenue has not substantiated their claim that the impugned product is classifiable under subheading 3301.00 of C.E.T.A. and we do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly the appeal filed by the Revenue is rejected.
|