Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2000 (6) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2000 (6) TMI 613 - CEGAT, CHENNAIExtract: .......1990 (47) E.L.T. 61 held that inter-departmental correspondence and movement of file is not a cause for condoning the delay. In view of these judgments, the Bench is not in a position to accept the reasons given and applying the ratio of the above noted judgments, the application for COD is rejected and as a consequence the appeal is also rejected.
|