Bookmarks   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login  
Tax Management India .com   
   TMI - Tax Management India. Com   
Cenvat credit on water treatment plant    *    Employees sent on deputation to subsidiary/ associate companies (Service Tax)    *    CIT u/s 263 has simply directed the AO, without satisfying himself, to verify whether the bifurcation made by assessee was with a view to reduce tax or not. No infirmity for offering the tax on sale of brands as LTCG. There is no merit in CITís observation for treating the same as business income. - Tri    *    Duty drawback    *    MEIS procedure for export    *    Subcontract Manufacturing by 100% EOU for a Main contractor (Outside India) who is in contract with an Indian Brand Owner for supply of Ready Made garments    *    CENVAT CREDIT    *    After GST - Machinery booking on commission    *    New Issue / query = Export against the INR Purchase Order    *    Where supply of goods without transfer to title has to be treated as service, whether on importation of such goods i.e. deemed services, customs duty and GST would be levied simultaneously?    *    First stage dealer    *    determination of assessable value for job work transaction    *    Cabinet approves Agreement and the Protocol between India and Cyprus for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion    *    Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI    *    Boarding and Rummaging of vessels, aircrafts and vehicles    *    service tax payament-reg    *    Education Cess / Secondary & Higher Education Cess    *    Seeks to further amend Notification No. 96/2008-Customs dated 13.08.2008 so as to include 'Republic of Guinea-Bissau' in the list of countries eligible for preferential tariff under the said notification    *    Amends Notification No.22/2003-Central Excise dated 31.3.2003    *    Regarding Filing of returns through digital signature

Income Tax Case Laws - Section: 211

Home Case Index Income Tax Sections List
Cases for Section: 211
Showing 1 to 15 of 31 Records
  • 2015 (2) TMI 675 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

    Rectification of mistake - whether on an application under section 154 of the Income-tax Act interest under section 214 of the Income-tax Act could be granted on advance tax payments, made after the prescribed dates but within the financial year? - H... ... ...

  • 2014 (1) TMI 1030 - ITAT MUMBAI

    Profits on sale of investments - Held that - The taxability of income of insurance companies under the head income from business and profession as governed by provisions of section 44 read with first schedule to the Income tax Act, does not extend to... ... ...

  • 2012 (7) TMI 183 - ITAT, DELHI

    Dis allowance of Prior Period Expenses - Held that - the assessee is following mercantile system of accounting. It is well settled that accrual of a statutory liability depends upon the terms of the relevant statute and the quantification or ascertai... ... ...

  • 2009 (4) TMI 88 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

    Whether ITAT was right in holding that for purposes of computation of interest under Section 234B and 234C, tax credit u/s 115JAA has to be first set off against the tax payable and the interest under the said sections have to be computed after takin... ... ...

  • 2007 (9) TMI 190 - DELHI HIGH COURT

    Since assessee was assessed to a loss for the A.Y. 1976-77 to 1978-79, thus for the AY 1979-80, assessee was not required to compute advance tax as per sec. 209(1)(a) or file a statement of advance tax interest levied for non-furnishing of statement is not justified


    Delay of one day in filing the estimate of advance tax - reasons for delay was totally beyond the control of the assessee as his main source of income was share from B and filing of estimate of advance tax was dependent upon the intimation by the sai... ... ...

  • 2006 (9) TMI 302 - ITAT DELHI

    Expenditure incurred in relation to income not includible in total income, Minimum Alternate Tax, Bad debts

  • 2006 (6) TMI 135 - ITAT BOMBAY-E

    ... ...
    ... ... ing the aforesaid view, we are ably guided by the decision of the Hon ble Delhi High Court in Dr. Prannoy Roy v. CIT 2005 254 ITR 755, which squarely covers the issue in hand. 11. In view of the foregoing, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.

  • 2004 (9) TMI 78 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court

    Whether interest u/s 214 could be denied to the assessee-corporation who had failed to pay the instalment of advance tax in accordance with the date specified u/s 211 held that the Legislature intended to provide that the dates given in section 210(1... ... ...

  • 1997 (3) TMI 40 - KERALA High Court

    ... ...
    ... ... the second question in the affirmative, against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. A copy of this judgment under the seal of this court and the signature of the Registrar shall be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench.

  • 1995 (12) TMI 32 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court

    ... ...
    ... ... leaving the applicant free to resort to appropriate remedy when the occasion so arises, as noted above, if permissible under the law. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Counsel fee on either side shall, however, be Rs. 750, if certified.

  • 1995 (4) TMI 22 - RAJASTHAN High Court

    Advance Tax, Appellate Orders, Financial Year, Interest Payable By Government On Excess Payment, Rectification Proceedings

  • 1994 (7) TMI 73 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court

    ... ...
    ... ... l consider this aspect of the matter while giving effect to the order in this reference. A copy of this order under the signature of the Registrar and the seal of the High Court shall be forwarded to the Tribunal. There shall be no order as to costs.

  • 1991 (5) TMI 37 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court

    ... ...
    ... ... be construed as such. Such being the settled position in law, we hereby answer the reference in the negative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. This reference is disposed of accordingly. There will, however, be no order as to costs.

  • 1989 (4) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA High Court

    ... ...
    ... ... t not have paid the advance tax by instalments on the due date(s). We, therefore, answer the question referred to this court in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee. There will be no order as to costs. BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE J. -I agree.

what is new what is new

Advanced Search

Latest Updates




More Options


|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version