Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Case Laws
Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

Service Tax - Case Laws

Showing 18921 to 18940 of 19063 Records

  • 2003 (7) TMI 412 - CESTAT, KOLKATA

    COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., BHUBANESWAR-II Versus TYAZHPROMEXPORT

    ... ...
    ... ... attract the provisions of Section 80. As such, we do not find any infirmity in the view taken by the Commissioner (Appeals) while setting aside the personal penalty imposed upon the respondents. Accordingly, we reject the appeal filed by the Revenue.


  • 2003 (7) TMI 3 - CESTAT, MUMBAI

    GUJARAT CONTAINERS LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, VADODARA

    ... ...
    ... ... hat the notice must also indicate the amount demanded and call upon the assessee to show cause. 5. 8195 Following the ratio of the above decision, I set aside the demand of service tax raised in the impugned orders-in-revision and allow the appeals.


  • 2003 (7) TMI 2 - CESTAT, MUMBAI

    NISA INDUSTRIAL SERVICE PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EXCISE, MUMBAI

    Service Tax - Payment made by appellant inadvertently in some non- designated bank....... + More


  • 2003 (7) TMI 1 - CESTAT, KOLKATA

    COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., BHUBANESWAR-II Versus TYAZHPROMEXPORT

    Service Tax Foreign company (1) Non-imposition (2) Reasonable cause (3) Penalty....... + More


  • 2003 (6) TMI 268 - CESTAT, KOLKATA

    COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, RANCHI Versus PENSOL INDUSTRIES LTD.

    ... ...
    ... ... ve amendment of the provisions, service tax become payable, which the assessee has paid along with interest. In the circumstances, no infirmity is found in the views taken by the Commissioner (Appeals). Revenue rsquo s appeal is accordingly rejected.


  • 2003 (6) TMI 6 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI

    GM TELECOM BSNL Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH

    Service Tax (1) Late payment by Government Department (2) Delay cause (3) Interest....... + More


  • 2003 (6) TMI 5 - CESTAT, MUMBAI

    EICHER CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. (APPEALS), MUMBAI

    Service Tax (1) Payment made by cheque (2) Realization of cheque....... + More


  • 2003 (6) TMI 4 - CESTAT, Bangalore

    SMITHA SHETTY Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BANGALORE

    Service Tax (1) Late payment (2) Failure to perform statutory obligation (3) Imposition of penalty....... + More


  • 2003 (6) TMI 3 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI

    GENERAL MANAGER (TELECOM) Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., CHANDIGARH

    Service Tax Collection of telecom charges - Late payment - No delay on part of appellant so could not be faulted for following collection and accounting procedure laid down by govt. itself so interest not payable....... + More


  • 2003 (6) TMI 2 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI

    HEXACOM (I) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPUR

    Service Tax If any amount are collected erroneously which is not in force, there is no bar to the return of such service tax amount....... + More


  • 2003 (5) TMI 3 - CESTAT, BANGALORE

    COMPOSITE INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., BANGALORE

    ... ...
    ... ... not empowered to review or revise the order when the matter was pending before the Commissioner (Appeals). Since it was revised, the said order is not sustainable in the eye of law. In the result, appeal is allowed with consequential relief, if any.


  • 2003 (5) TMI 2 - CESTAT, CHENNAI

    SUPER SECURITY SERVICE Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, TRICHY

    Service Tax Man Power Recruiting Agency (1) Demand (2) Limitation (3) Valuation....... + More


  • 2003 (5) TMI 1 - CESTAT, Bangalore

    EV MATHAI & CO. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, COCHIN

    ... ...
    ... ... entitled to refund of the said amount. Further in view of the submissions made by the DR, the position with reference to the unjust enrichment may be examined by the adjudicating authority. Thus these two appeals are disposed of in the above terms.


  • 2003 (3) TMI 2 - Supreme Court

    Tamil Nadu Tour Vehicle Owners & Operators Assn. Versus. U. OI

    Service Tax (1) Stage carriage operators (2) Contract carriage operators (3) Motor Cab owners or Maxi Cab operators (4) Tour operators or rent-a-cab operators ....... + More


  • 2003 (3) TMI 1 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI

    COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., JAIPUR-I Versus GENUS OVERSEAS ELECTRONICS LTD.

    Service Tax (1) Duty liability (2) Payment of duty made by cheque (3) Delay in encashment beyond due date (4) Date of payment....... + More


  • 2003 (2) TMI 414 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI

    MARK AUTO INDUSTRIES Versus COMMR. OF C. EX., NEW DELHI

    ... ...
    ... ... Services. The Appeals filed by the Applicants against withdrawing the sanction of Service Tax were dismissed. As such there is no error on the face of the record in the Final Order passed by the Tribunal. Accordingly, the ROM application is rejected.


  • 2003 (1) TMI 4 - CEGAT, KOLKATA

    UTKAL AGRO INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & CUS., BBSR-I

    Service Tax (1) Appeal (2) Limitation (3) Delay of two months in filing (4) Delay condoned (5) Penalty....... + More


  • 2003 (1) TMI 3 - CEGAT, KOLKATA

    ON TIME COURIERS Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA-I

    Service Tax - Courier agents (1) Service rendered by a courier company to the Diplomatic Missions and the International organization (2) Services between two courier agents....... + More


  • 2003 (1) TMI 2 - CEGAT, KOLKATA

    3-A ASSOCIATES Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAMSHEDPUR

    ... ...
    ... ... nasmuch as it is a matter, inter se, between the appellants and M/s. TISCO and would not alter the legal position as discussed above in the preceding paragraph. In view of the foregoing, we find no merits in the appellants appeal and reject the same.


  • 2003 (1) TMI 1 - CEGAT, MUMBAI

    SHAMAN MARKETING RESEARCH ASSOCIATES Versus COMMR. OF C. EX., MUMBAI-V

    Service Tax Tax paid in UBI instead of SBI - Interest and Penalty....... + More


 
 
 
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version