Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Case Laws
Home Case Index All Cases Customs SC Customs - SC
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

Customs - Supreme Court - Case Laws

Showing 41 to 60 of 1735 Records

  • 2017 (2) TMI 1057 - SUPREME COURT

    Pradeep H. Ambre Versus State of Maharashtra & Another

    Detention order - Held that - even on the basis of preponderance of probability the allegation of import of Ball Bearings in the guise of Borax Decahydrate in the past consignments is not established and that all allegations leveled against Shri Pradeep Ambre are baseless and unfounded - the detention order dated 11th August, 2005, was even otherwise improper and unjustified in view of the factual position - petition allowed - decided in favor of....... + More


  • 2017 (2) TMI 924 - SUPREME COURT

    The Designated Authority & Others Versus M/s. Sandisk International Limited & Others And Moser Baer India Ltd. Versus The Designated Authority And Others

    Locus of the respondent to file the writ petition before the Delhi High Court - Levy of Anti-dumping Duty on USB Flash Drives - validity of investigation and findings of the Designated Authority (DA) - Sub section (5) of Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - the decision in the case Sandisk International Ltd. Versus The Designated Authority & Ors. 2015 (9) TMI 402 - DELHI HIGH COURT , contested upon - Held that - the respondent - M/s S....... + More


  • 2017 (2) TMI 815 - SUPREME COURT

    Magus Metals (P) Ltd. Versus P.E. Prasad Regional Manager Inc

    Demurrage charges - release of goods on payment of demurrage charges - Held that - the appeal is pending before this Court for about 8 years, we deem it appropriate to direct the respondent to release the goods in question to the petitioner subject to the condition the petitioner gives a bank guarantee for an amount of ₹ 10 lakhs within a period of three weeks - appeal disposed off........ + More


  • 2017 (2) TMI 471 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

    R.K. Kapoor, Advocate Versus Union of India & Ors

    Narcotics laboratories - Re-testing provisions - it is imperative to define re-testing rights, if at all, as an amalgamation of the above-stated factors. Further, in light of Section 52-A of the NDPS Act, which permits swift disposal of some hazardous substances, the time frame within which any application for re-testing may be permitted ought to be strictly defined. - Decision in the matter of Thana Singh Vs. Central Bureau of Narcotics 2013 (1)....... + More


  • 2017 (2) TMI 294 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

    Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai Versus M/s Aban Loyd Chiles Offshore Ltd. & Ors.

    Import of rigs for repair and reexport - non filing of Import General Manifest of the towing rigs - Confiscation of goods - foreign going vessel - imposition of redemption fine and penalty - benefit of N/N. 153/94-Cus - whether foreign going vessels cease to be so when they enter into Indian territorial waters only for repairs? - goods for the purposes of Section 46(1) of the Act - Held that - the vessel was in operation and primarily used within....... + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 1515 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

    Fortune Marketing Pvt Ltd. Versus Commissioner Of Customs (Import) , Acc Mumbai

    Delay condoned - there are no material to interfere with the proceedings - the decisions are upheld - appeal dismissed........ + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 1468 - SUPREME COURT

    Jiji Industries Ltd. Versus Union of India

    Delivery of documents seized by respondents - the case of petitioner is that at present, he has received total 192 files and 16 files are still with them and due to the aforesaid, he is not in a position to file his reply to the show cause notice or appear before the appropriate authority - the decision in the case of Jiji Industries Ltd. Versus Union of India 2016 (7) TMI 1274 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT contested, where it was held that no case....... + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 478 - SUPREME COURT

    M/s. Prashray Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs (Exports) Chennai

    Levy of CVD on import of silk fabrics - the matter is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court passed in Civil Appeal NO. 9440 of 2003 titled as M/s. SRF Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai . The High Court in the impugned judgment has been mainly influenced by the fact that review petition was filed by the Revenue in the said judgment in which notice was issued - the decision in the case of The Commissioner of Customs (Exports) Versu....... + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 477 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Logic India Trading Co.

    Classification of import of Multimedia Speakers - the decision in the case of Logic India Trading Co Versus Commissioner of Customs 2016 (3) TMI 5 - CESTAT BANGALORE referred - Held that - We find no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment - delay condoned - appeal dismissed........ + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 476 - SUPREME COURT

    Sanjay Goyal Versus Commissioner

    Review petition - the decision in the case of Andhra Sugars Ltd. Versus Commissioner 2016 (1) TMI 761 - SUPREME COURT referred - Held that - Despite time granted by learned Chamber Judge vide order dated 27-4-2016, learned counsel for the petitioner has not taken any steps to pay deficit Court fee - review petition dismissed for non-prosecution........ + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 475 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Oracle India Pvt. Ltd.

    Valuation - Import of Oracle packaged software - the decision in the case of Shri Atul Kaushik, Shri Krishan Dhawan, M/s. Oracle India Pvt. Ltd. Versus C.C. (Export) , New Delhi 2015 (9) TMI 317 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - Held that - delay condoned - appeal dismissed - decided against appellant........ + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 474 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Adani Enterprise Ltd.

    Undue benefit of Target Plus Scheme (TPS) - the decision in the case of CC (II) Airport Special Cargo, Mumbai And Others Versus Shri Samir Vora And Others 2015 (9) TMI 1370 - CESTAT MUMBAI contested - Held that - We see no reason to interfere with the orders passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal - appeal dismissed - decided against appellant........ + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 473 - SUPREME COURT

    Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. Versus Commissioner

    Waiver of pre-deposit - Violation of notification No.20/99-Cus and 16/2000 - the decision in the case of 2015 (9) TMI 818 - CESTAT CHENNAI contested - Held that - no coercive steps shall be taken for realization of the dues as per the judgment of the adjudicating authority, subject to the petitioner paying 75 per cent of the principal amount. If any amount has been deposited or paid earlier, the same shall be adjusted - imposed penalty is stayed ....... + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 409 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Special Project Finance (I) P. Ltd.

    Duty demanded on waste & rejects cleared in the DTA & on inputs used in mfg. of those waste - the decision in the case of COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., SURAT-Il Versus SPECIAL PROJECT FINANCE (I) P. LTD 2008 (1) TMI 152 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD contested - Held that - reliance placed in the judgment in the case of M/s. Virlon Textile Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay 2007 (4) TMI 6 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , and appeal dismissed -....... + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 408 - SUPREME COURT

    Union of India Versus Sangit Krishna Kumar Agrawal

    Bail - Anticipatory bail - the case of SANGIT KRISHNA KUMAR AGRAWAL Versus UNION OF INDIA 2007 (2) TMI 230 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT referred - Held that - This Court, while entertaining the special leave petition and while granting leave in the matter, did not grant any interim relief to the appellant - no justification found to entertain the present appeal - appeal dismissed - decided against appellant........ + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 406 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Thermon Heat Tracers Ltd.

    Valuation - Transaction value - the decision in the case of THERMON HEAT TRACERS LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI 2006 (2) TMI 315 - CESTAT, MUMBAI contested - Held that - the issue involved in these appeals is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad v. Essar Steel Limited 2015 (4) TMI 486 - SUPREME COURT - appeal dismissed - decided against appellant........ + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 402 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Vallabh Design Products

    Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) scheme - transfer of licences - Held that - decision in the case of Commissioner of Customs, Amritsar v. Ajay Kumar & Co. 2009 (5) TMI 20 - SUPREME COURT referred - appeal dismissed - decided against appellant........ + More


  • 2016 (12) TMI 266 - SUPREME COURT

    Vedanta Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs (Port) And Another

    Refund of customs duty paid - short shipped goods - time bar - Held that - decision in the case of Vedanta Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs (Port) 2016 (5) TMI 437 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT contested - the provision of Section 27 of the Customs Act would clearly not apply to the present case on its plain language - the respondent should refund the excess customs duty paid within a period of four weeks - petition allowed - decided in favor of petit....... + More


  • 2016 (12) TMI 139 - SUPREME COURT

    M/s. Picasso Overseas Versus Commissioner of Customs

    Deposit of the amount directed by the Division Bench with interest at the rate of 12 per annum before the Tribunal within a period of eight weeks from today. If the amount is not deposited before the Tribunal within a period of eight weeks, the petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court - However, if the amount is deposited, the Tribunal may consider the matter on merits. - the decision in the case of M/s. Picasso Overs....... + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 1431 - SUPREME COURT

    Chairman, C.B.E. & C. Versus Rajesh Exports Ltd.

    Seeking quash of letter dated June 18, 2013 and declaration that the condition Nos.34(b) and 34(c) of the notification No.12 of 2012, was satisfied by the petitioner while importing - Import of gold dore bar - goods are to be imported in accordance with the packaging list issued by the mining company by whom they are produced - the decision in the case of The Chairman Central Board of Excise And Customs, Commissioner of Customs Versus M/s. Rajesh....... + More


3........
 
 
 
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version