Tax Management India. Com
                            Law and Practice: A Digital eBook ...
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Manuals SMS News Articles Highlights
        Home        
 
Case Laws
Home Case Index All Cases Customs This
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

Customs - Case Laws

Showing 29021 to 29040 of 30111 Records

More information of case laws are visible to the Subscriber of a package i.e:-
Party Name, Court Name, Date of Decision, Full Text of Headnote & Decision etc.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 402

    ... ...
    ... ... forthwith release the goods to the petitioner upon payment of the duty already assessed. 29. Let a plain copy of this order countersigned by the Assistant Registrar (Court) be handed over to the learned Advocate appearing for the parties concerned.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 391

    ... ...
    ... ... der the order of the Tribunal meriting a reference to the High Court. 9. We, therefore, find that no question of law arises out of the order of the Tribunal for reference under Section 130(1) of the Act. Accordingly, we dismiss the application.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 385

    ... ...
    ... ... w of the orders of the Supreme Court, the appellants are held entitled to and arc ordered to be refunded the sums collected from them as countervailing duty in the five cases within 3 months from the date of this order. The appeals are thus allowed.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 384

    ... ...
    ... ... by sufficient cause in the late filing of the revision applications. Accordingly, all the four appeals are dismissed being hit by limitation. Since the appeals are dismissed on the point of limitation, I am not going into the merits of the appeals.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 383

    ... ...
    ... ... ties and I had advised the appellant to approach the lower authorities for getting the copies of the same and if the lower authorities do not accede to his request, he may approach this court for necessary directions as to the production of records.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 382

    ... ...
    ... ... sly exercised by the learned Collector. In the circumstances we see no reason to interfere with that part of the order also. 16. After careful consideration of all the aspects, we see no merit in this appeal, and accordingly we reject the same.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 379

    ... ...
    ... ... eject this application for condonation of delay. 11. As we have rejected the applicant’s application for condonation of delay the appeal shall have to be rejected as barred by time, and accordingly, we reject the appeal as barred by time.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 377

    ... ...
    ... ... one roll with width less than 15 Cms. per invoice at page 14, shall be so exempt whereas the second roll having width, in excess of 15 Cms. will not be so exempt. 17. We allow the appeal to the extent indicated above with consequential relief.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 376

    ... ...
    ... ... he Customs Act, 1962. Accordingly, I hold that this Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide the present appeal. The appellant as well as the respondent are directed to appear in this Court on the 24th August, 1984 for hearing and disposal of the appeal.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 375

    ... ...
    ... ... n 23 of the Customs Act deals as to the remission of duty on lost, destroyed or abandoned goods. In the result I hold that the appellant’s refund claim is barred by limitation under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appeal is dismissed.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 374

    ... ...
    ... ... the claim for project import in this case is an after thought. 9. We accordingly hold that the prescribed regulations not having been complied with, the goods are not entitled to assessment under Heading 84.66. We, therefore, reject the appeal.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 372

    ... ...
    ... ... d further direct that he should afford an opportunity to the appellant to cross-examine the testing officer and decide the same in accordance with the law within six months from the date of this order. For statistical purposes the appeal is allowed.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 367

    ... ...
    ... ... ppropriate classification was 38.01/19 (6) as ”Plasticizers, not elsewwere specified". 11. We allow the appeal. Consequential relief shall be granted to the appellants within three months from the date of communication of this order.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 363

    ... ...
    ... ... ppeal as barred by time the appellants cannot in law make any grievance against such an order. The order passed by the Appellate Collector is wholly legal and therefore not to be interfered with. Accordingly, I reject this appeal as having no merit.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 356

    ... ...
    ... ... ame within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made in this order. 7. However there will be no order as to costs. 8. Communicate the order within 2 weeks.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 332

    ... ...
    ... ... hereby rejected. 31. emsp A copy of this order shall be placed in each of the appeal files. 32. emsp Before parting with cases, we must place on record the invaluable assistance we have received from the learned Counsels of both sides in these cases.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 267

    ... ...
    ... ... ion for die opinion formed by the competent authority. 10. In my opinion no case has been made out for interference. The petition is dismissed. As there has been no appearance on behalf of the respondents, I leave the parties to bear their own costs.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 257

    ... ...
    ... ... ce in the contention of the appellants that the lower authorities have fixed the fine at an excessive level. 15. In the result, we reject the various contentions made by the appellants, uphold the impugned Order dated 7-3-1984 and dismiss the appeal.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 84

    ... ...
    ... ... he petitioner within one week from the date of communication of this order. 22. Let a plain copy of this order and judgment countersigned by the Assistant Registrar (Court) be handed over to the learned advocates appearing for the parties concerned.


  • 1984 (7) TMI 83

    ... ...
    ... ... Such certificate shall be issued forthwith upon payment by the petitioners of the assessed duty. 11. Let a plain copy of this order countersigned by the Assistant Registrar (Court) be handed over to the Advocates appearing for the parties concerned.


 
 
 
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.