Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Manuals News SMS Articles Highlights
        Home        
Case Laws
Home Case Index All Cases FEMA HC FEMA - HC This
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

FEMA - High Court - Case Laws

Showing 81 to 100 of 364 Records

  • 2015 (1) TMI 1170

    Foreign exchange allocated against the license having not been utilized - Waiver of pre deposit - Imposition of penalty - Held that - Under the statutory scheme the appellants are under an obligation to file appeal simultaneously along with penalty amount unless and until dispensation is granted under Second proviso to Section 52 (2) on the application of the appellants after getting satisfied about the prima facie good case and undue hardship of....... + More


  • 2015 (1) TMI 1122

    Contravention of Section 8(3) and 8(4) read with Section 68 of FEMA read with para-7A, 20(i) of Exchange Control Manual, 1995 (ECM) - Held that - Impugned order of the appellate tribunal and the order-in-original suffer from serious infractions of the principles of natural justice and, even on merits, it appears that the appellants were able to provide sufficient material on record to raise a serious doubt about the alleged violation of FEMA. - I....... + More


  • 2015 (1) TMI 1074

    Violation of procedure contemplated in Rule 4 - Rejection of request of cross examination - Held that - On a bare reading of the show cause notice it is seen that a complaint was made under section 16(3) of FEMA for contravention of the provisions of FEMA. The adjudicating authority on a perusal of the complaint and after considering the cause assigned by the complainant in the said complaint, stated that it appears that there is contravention in....... + More


  • 2015 (1) TMI 1026

    Contravention of Sections 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d) of FERA - penalty under Section 50 of the FERA - Held that - Retraction of the confessional statement containing admission of wrong-doings by the appellant came after more than ten years, at the stage of personal hearing only, and not before that. Had the appellant been subjected to threat, coercion or pressure as alleged by him rather belatedly, he would have retracted his confessional statement soon....... + More


  • 2015 (1) TMI 977

    Contravention of the provisions of Sections 8(1), Section 6(4) and Section 6(5) read with Section 7 of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Imposition of penalty - Sale of foreign currency at higher value - Held that - Two persons identified themselves as Hanif and Rajesh Mhatre of Hotel Zam Zam. Mhatre was carrying briefcase along with him. A search revealed that one Suleman Patel with the help of Ms. Pinky Jaisinghani and Sanjay Jadhwani wer....... + More


  • 2014 (11) TMI 1140

    Interest on refund - grievance of the petitioner is that although the amount has been refunded to the petitioner, he has not received interest on the demand drafts for a sum of ₹ 1.70 crores, which were seized by respondent No.1 on 19.05.2001 - Held that - In the event income tax has been deducted at source in respect of interest on a sum of ₹ 1.70 crores, it is obvious that the interest would have been credited to the account of the ....... + More


  • 2014 (10) TMI 527

    Revocation of appellant s Passport - penalty on the appellant under Section 13 of FEMA for having contravened the provisions of Section 37 of FEMA read with Section 131(1) and 272A(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. - Held that - officers under the Income-tax Act have the same powers as are vested in a court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to try a suit in respect of inter alia discovery and inspection, enforcing the attendance of any person....... + More


  • 2014 (10) TMI 404

    Contravention of Sections 9 (1) (b), 9 (1) (c) and 9 (1) (d) read with Section 64 (2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1973 - Remission of amount from abroad - Held that - ED itself is not clear whether the declaration made by Mr. Sri Chawla in Bangkok could be termed as a statement under Section 40 of FERA. It is not shown that the procedure envisaged under FERA was followed while recording the said declaration. In any event, Mr. Sri Cha....... + More


  • 2014 (9) TMI 1085

    Guilty of the offence under Sections 6(4), 6(5) 8(1), 9(1)(a) and 9(1)(f)(i) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - fine imposed - Held that - In the first place, it is not clear why, after recording the statements under Section 40 of FERA of the appellant and Mr. Mendiratta in May 1995, the ED waited till the last date of the sunset period, i.e., 30th May, 2002 for issuing the Memorandum. The second feature is that the only relied upon docum....... + More


  • 2014 (8) TMI 1105

    Complaint filed under Section 16(3) FEMA - Writ of mandamus to forbear the respondent from proceeding further with the adjudication in pursuance of a show cause notice, without complying with a particular Rule - Held that - The scheme of Section 4 actually provides opportunities at the every stage to the noticee. The forming of an opinion at the stage of show cause notice and receipt of reply, as provided in sub-rule (3) of Rule 4, is almost akin....... + More


  • 2014 (8) TMI 607

    Contravention of Section 8 (3) read with Section 8 (4) and Section 68 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Penalty upon Director of company - Appellant states that he was a part time, non-executive director of MXL but neither in-charge of nor responsible for the conduct of its day-to-day affairs. MXL commenced its business in the year 1983-84 and had been importing goods/raw materials for its business requirements. MXL was amalgamated w....... + More


  • 2014 (7) TMI 1151

    Rejection of application seeking compounding of offence punishable under Section 23(1) read with 4(1) of Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 2010 - Held that - a perusal of the impugned order shows that no reason for declining the application for compounding has been given and he has no objection if the matter is remanded back to the competent authority on this issue. - in view of the principle of audi-alterem partem, the CBI could not have been....... + More


  • 2014 (7) TMI 727

    Condonation of delay - delay of 179 days - it is submitted that, collective decision was required to be taken in the government departments at various levels, therefore, valuable time was consumed - Held that - under Section 35 of FEMA, appeal against the decision or order of the Appellate Tribunal would lie before the High Court provided the appeal is filed within a period of 60 days, extendable by a further period not exceeding 60 days if the H....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 577

    Hawala transactions - Partial explanation of payment made through hawala channels - During investigation appellant invoked right against self incrimination under Article 20(3) - Imposition of penalty - Held that - Impugned AO of the SD, ED and the impugned order of the AT proceeded on the basis that the Appellant could not have validly invoked the right against self-incrimination under Article 20 (3) of the Constitution since he was not accused i....... + More


  • 2014 (5) TMI 863

    Contravention of Section 9 (1) (d) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Payment made on behalf of foreign national without prior approval of RBI - Held that - There can be no doubt that a retracted statement under Section 40 FERA, cannot form the sole basis for determining whether the maker of such a statement is guilty of contravening any of the provisions of FERA. It shall have to be corroborated by other independent evidence. In determin....... + More


  • 2014 (5) TMI 824

    Violation of Section 8 (1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - allegation that appellant has exported the goods only for availing export benefits - levy of penalty - Held that - From the inquiries purportedly made by CGI, Dubai, as reflected in the correspondence between it and the DRI, the consignment was probably not cleared by APL since there were legal problems regarding the copyright raised by the Dubai Customs. Interestingly, in ....... + More


  • 2014 (5) TMI 784

    Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 8(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1973 - Penalty - recovery and seizure of Indian currency - No opportunity for cross examination granted - Held that - there was miscarriage of justice in denying the request of the Appellants for cross-examination of the ED officials. Allowing the request would have enabled the SD to determine whether the claim that the confessional statements were recorded under threa....... + More


  • 2014 (4) TMI 1162

    Under-invoicing of the imports - Contravention of Sections 8 (3) read with 8 (4) of the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act - Held that - There is nothing incriminating in the statements made by the Appellant under Section 40 FERA, admitting to under-invoicing of the imports. As far as the statement of Mr. Puri is concerned, it is seen that it was made under Section 108 of the CA and not Section 40 FERA and could not, ipso facto, be used for the pro....... + More


  • 2014 (4) TMI 612

    Condonation of delay - Inordinate delay of 804 days in filing of appeal - Section 35 of FEMA - Held that - Section 54 FERA permits an appeal to be filed to the High Court within 60 days. The proviso clearly prescribes that the High Court shall not entertain any appeal under Section 54 if it is filed after the expiry of 60 days of the date of communication of the decision or order of Appellate Tribunal unless the High Court is satisfied that the a....... + More


  • 2014 (4) TMI 585

    Violation of Section 8(1), 16(1), 9(1)(a) and 9(1)(c)of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Special Director purportedly issued a Corrigendum stating that paragraph No. 87 is deleted and in paragraph No. 88 in line No.2 after the words Noticee No.1 and before the name Mr. Stephen John Michie, the name Shri Raman Narula-Noticee No.2 is inserted - Held that - no prior notice was issued to Mr. Narula by the SD when the Corrigendum was issued....... + More


5........
 
 
 
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Let's just recapitulate:

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.