Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Case Laws
Home Case Index All Cases FEMA
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

FEMA - Case Laws

Showing 41 to 60 of 573 Records

  • 2017 (1) TMI 826 - DELHI HIGH COURT

    Innovative Tech Pack Ltd. Versus Special Director Of Enforcement

    Violation of Section 8 (3) and Section 8 (4) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 read with Chapter 7A.20 (i) of the Exchange Control Manual, 1995 - Held that - Courts have repeatedly held that in quasi criminal proceedings the penalty should not be imposed merely because it is lawful to impose the penalty. Whether penalty should be imposed or not is a matter of discretion to be exercised judicially and on consideration of all the relevan....... + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 461 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

    M/s. Advantage Strategic Consulting Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India, Director of Enforcement, The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement

    Maintainability of the writ petitions before this Court - whether issue involved in these writ petitions relate to 2G Spectrum Case and therefore, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain these writ petitions? - Held that - Since the investigation carried on by the respondents is being monitored by the Honourable Supreme Court, it is too early for this Court to take up these writ petitions for adjudication on merits. Consequently, the prelimin....... + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 398 - SUPREME COURT

    Gautam Jain Versus Union of India & Another

    Principle of segregation - Detention order - Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - High Court has come to the conclusion that there were various grounds which formed the basis of the detention order and even if the documents pertaining to one particular ground were not furnished, that ground could be ignored applying the principle of segregation and on remaining grounds the detenti....... + More


  • 2016 (9) TMI 1352 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI

    Mittal Ispat Ltd. Versus Enforcement Directorate

    Contravention of Section 3(d) r/w Section 42(1)(2) of FEMA, 1999 - search - payments in foreign exchange - Held that - No foreign currency has been recovered. There is no corroboration evidence of the fact that the payments allegedly made by the appellants were made as per the instructions from abroad. There is no evidence available to establish that the payments so made were in consideration of foreign exchange so acquired by the appellant compa....... + More


  • 2016 (9) TMI 1344 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI

    Directorate of Enforcement Versus Brig. Kapil Mohan

    Guilty under Sections 18(2) and 18(3) read with Section 58 of FERA, 1973 - liability by a deeming fiction - criminal liability fastened against in charge and responsible for the conduct of the business of the company - Held that - No evidence has been lead by the Enforcement Directorate in the Adjudication Proceedings to the effect that the respondents were in-charge and were responsible for the conduct of the business of the company. Vicarious l....... + More


  • 2016 (9) TMI 352 - FOREIGN EXCHANGE Tribunal

    Prakash Bafna Versus Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement

    Proceedings leveled against co-noticee - appellant was resident outside India - Held that - Nothing incriminating from the raid carried out at the residential and business premises of the appellant could be found. There is no documentary evidence in support of the allegations of the respondent. There is no evidence on record to show that the appellant was involved in any act of alleged purchase and sale of foreign currency. For the alleged credit....... + More


  • 2016 (9) TMI 166 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

    The Competent Authority, Chennai Versus M. Khader Moideen and The Chairman, Appellate Tribunal

    Defective notice - Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the notice is defective and unsustainable? - Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the independent properties of a relative of a convict or detenu,cannot be forfeited? - Held that - As already held that the notice does not establish any link between the convict and the properties. It is also not the case of the petitioner that the properties were purchased out of illegal i....... + More


  • 2016 (7) TMI 1341 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI

    Pankaj Gupta Versus Enforcement Directorate

    Contravention of provision of Section 8 of FEMA, 1999 r/w Regulations 9 and 13 of Foreign Exchange Management (Export of Goods and Services) Regulations, 2000 - failure to prove the service of either SCN or notice for personal hearing or the service of impugned order upon the appellant - Held that - We are of the view that the respondent has failed to prove the service of either SCN or notice for personal hearing or the service of impugned order ....... + More


  • 2016 (6) TMI 1187 - DELHI HIGH COURT

    Sukh Ram Versus Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.

    Sentencing the petitioner solely on the basis of uncorroborated testimony of sole witness Mr.Chanderkant Khemka - Held that - Admittedly, the remedy of appeal is available against the impugned order under Section 17 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999. - Since, the petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy, the present writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is given liberty to raise all his pleas and contentions befor....... + More


  • 2016 (6) TMI 341 - SUPREME COURT

    M/s Videocon Industries Ltd. Another Versus State of Maharshtra & Others

    Offence punishable under Section 56(1)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 for the alleged contravention of the provisions of Sections 18(2) and 18(3) of the Act - Held that - The tribunal has arrived at a conclusion that the appellant cannot be held guilty for Section 18(2) read with Section 18(3) of FER Act, 1973 and the advise of the Reserve Bank of India given in its letters dated 21.1.1992 and 18.2.1994 deserve to be accepted as ....... + More


  • 2016 (6) TMI 58 - PATNA HIGH COURT

    Brajesh Kumar Srivastava, S/o Surendra Prasad Srivastava Versus The State of Bihar

    Sealing of office premises challenged - case registered under Sections 420, 120-B, 467, 468, 471, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short IPC ) and Sections 3, 4 and 13 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Held that - The office premises of the Company, which was sealed by the police in connection with the police case, is neither a stolen property nor the object of the crime nor has any link with the commission of any offence. It is ....... + More


  • 2016 (6) TMI 3 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

    Ashok Kumar Doshi Versus Union of India And Others

    Refusal to dispense with the amount of deposit of the penalty fully by Foreign Exchange Appellate Tribunal - Held that - The learned Tribunal omitted to notice that there was unexplained delay of nine years in issuing the show cause notice. The learned Tribunal also ignored the fact that the appellant was a mere agent of the principal, Sri S.Jegathesan. - Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that the Tribunal....... + More


  • 2016 (5) TMI 1383 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI

    Enforcement Directorate, Chennai Versus Icomm Tele Ltd.

    Contravention of Sections 8(3) and 8(4) of FERA, 1973 - direction of furnishing corporate guarantee - interpretation in the review petitioner that the corporate guarantee is a business consideration - Held that - The guarantor is bound to indemnify the authority to whom corporate guarantee is furnished. Relationship of business is not a necessary condition. Generally the corporate guarantee is furnished on the basis of overall performance and goo....... + More


  • 2016 (5) TMI 740 - SUPREME COURT

    Jatin C Jhaveri Versus Union Of India And Vice-Versa

    Confiscation of foreign currency and imposition of penalty - Clauses (d), (e) and (i) of Section 113 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Seizure of US dollars - Import of currency as advance payments towards supply of diamonds - absence of requisite permission of Reserve Bank of India - Held that - the greater significance and important is the absence of any special or general permission as contemplated under Section 8(1) of FERA. No such permission is pr....... + More


  • 2016 (5) TMI 518 - SUPREME COURT

    V. Suganthi Versus Joint Secretary To Govt. Of India & Anr

    Preventive detention passed against the detenue husband of the appellant herein as well as few other persons - Held that - It has come on record and noted in the order of detention that large sums of money were received in the said bank account which was opened in the name of the detenue and the money which was disbursed from this account amounted to ₹ 40.52 crores. It was further found by the detaining authority that the detenue was also o....... + More


  • 2016 (4) TMI 782 - KERALA HIGH COURT

    K.M. MOHAMMED SHAFI AND OTHERS Versus UNION OF INDIA

    Aggrieved person - Whether the 4th respondent, Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement can be said to be an aggrieved person from the order dated 3.7.2013 of the Adjudicating Authority, the Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement so as to file an appeal under Section 17(2) of 1999 FEMA Act - Held that - Section 19 of the 1999 Act provides appeal to the Appellate Tribunal against an order; (i) passed by the Adjudicating Authority oth....... + More


  • 2016 (4) TMI 759 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

    Union of India Versus Dimple D. Sheth

    Default to file a private paper book - Held that - The delay has been continuing over last eight years. Even after this Court had permitted the applicant/appellant to file a private paper book, still the default has continued. It is not known why the applicant/appellant has not been able to trace the record. The explanation therefore, does not inspire much confidence. - The Director of Enforcement cannot go on giving instructions to seek time or ....... + More


  • 2016 (4) TMI 715 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

    Mohammed Yusuff Sahib Versus Special Director, Enforcement Directorate, New Delhi.

    Proceedings under Section 51 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Currency seized from the premises of assessee should be confiscated to the Central Government in terms of Section 63 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - maintainability of the appeal filed by the respondents before the Tribunal - Held that - A careful comparison of the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 and the Foreign Exchange Management A....... + More


  • 2016 (4) TMI 677 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

    Bipinchandra G. Chockshi And 1 Versus State of Gujarat And 2

    Order of detention - Held that - There are previous decisions of Division Bench of this High Court that detaining authority is under obligation to comply with the requirements by formulating grounds for detention and on factual aspect also, there is no reason to detain such person and therefore, as recorded herein above, the Division Bench has gone to the extent of saying that a grosser case than this is yet to be seen. - Thus the impugned order ....... + More


  • 2016 (4) TMI 615 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

    Sajal Dutta Versus Reserve Bank of India & Others

    Issue of grant or revocation of grant of licence - Held that - The licence to import was vitally connected with the shareholding of Kamal Kr. Datta and the percentage shareholding of his brother Sajal Datta. If the number of shares issued to Kamal increased on the basis of importation of those items, the percentage shareholding of Sajal was likely to fall. Therefore, both the company and its principal shareholders Kamal and Sajal had an interest ....... + More


3........
 
 
 
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version