Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Case Laws
Home Case Index All Cases 2010 TMI Tri 2010 (12) TMI 2010 TMI Tri 2010 (12) TMI Tri
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

Case Laws - Tribunal - Case Laws

Showing 1 to 20 of 490 Records

  • 2010 (12) TMI 1287 - ITAT KOLKATA

    ITO (E) -II, Kolkata Versus Sree Sree Mohanananda Samaj Seva Samity.

    ... ...
    ... ... after taking into consideration the submissions made by the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A). We order accordingly. 10. In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 10.12.2010


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1283 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD

    M/s JB Exports, Versus l Commissioner of Income tax-

    ... ...
    ... ... u/s 263 of the Act and quash the same. Therefore, ground nos. 1 to 3 in the appeal are allowed. Consequently, ground no. 4 does not survive for our adjudication . 8. In the result , appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in the court today on16-12-2010


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1278 - ITAT, KOLKATA

    ITO (E) -II, Kolkata Versus Sree Sree Mohanananda Brahmachari Medical Welfare Trust

    ... ...
    ... ... ers, we set aside these appeals of the Revenue also to the file of the AO for fresh consideration, after giving reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. 4. In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes.


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1276 - ITAT DELHI

    Adobe Software India Private Ltd. (Now merged with Adobe Systems India Private Ltd.) Versus Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Noida Range, Noida (U. P).

    ... ...
    ... ... tter also to the file of the DRP for hearing the assessee again and passing a speaking order as per law. 6. In the result, the appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. This order was pronounced in the open court on 27th December, 2010.


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1271 - ITAT DELHI

    Dy. Director of Income Tax (Int. Taxation) , Dehradun Versus Maersk Company Ltd. UK C/o A.F. Ferguson & Co.

    ... ...
    ... ... Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on this issue and decide the issue in favour of the assessee. 10. In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 08/12/2010 upon conclusion of hearing.


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1268 - ITAT DELHI

    Intimate Jewels Pvt. Limited Versus ITO, Ward 11 (4) , New Delhi

    ... ...
    ... ... discussion, we do not deem it necessary to go into the question whether addition of ₹ 4,01,000/- is sustainable or not. 7. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in open court on this 30th day of December, 2010.


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1264 - ITAT MUMBAI

    Mr. Suresh B. Dedhia Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-21 (2) , Mumbai.

    ... ...
    ... ... penalty u/s 158BFA is not mandatory but discretionary and for the proposition that no penalty can be levied when the issue is debatable. 23. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 3rd Dec. , 2010.


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1263 - ITAT HYDERABAD

    Medha Servo Drivers (P) Ltd. Versus ACIT, Circle 16 (2) , Hyderabad

    ... ...
    ... ... ngly, we do not find any infirmity in the order of the CIT(A) in deletion of penalty and the same is confirmed. 12. In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as revenue are dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court 30.12.2010.


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1262 - ITAT MUMBAI

    Vinod K. Nevatia Versus Asst. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Mumbai

    ... ...
    ... ... ing the assessee’s submissions. 15. In the result, the revenue’s appeal is dismissed while the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 3rd day of December, 2010.


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1261 - ITAT CHENNAI

    The ACIT, Cir. II, Bareilly Versus M/s. S.E. Enteprises Pvt. Ltd.,

    ... ...
    ... ... merit in the ground raised by the Revenue and consequently we dismiss the same. 20. Grounds No.5 and 6 are general in nature and need no adjudication. 21. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. The order pronounced in the open Court on 30.12.2010.


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1260 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    CCE, Jaipur-II Versus M/s. Shree Rajasthan Synthetics Ltd.

    Refund claim - Notification No. 41/07-ST dated 06.10.2007 - Duty drawback - held that - since the goods in question have been exported without availing drawback of service tax under the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax drawback Rules, 1995, therefore recovery of refund claim of service tax paid on specified services on the ground that goods have been exported under claim of drawback is not tenable........ + More


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1258 - ITAT MUMBAI

    DCIT 2 (3) , Mumbai Versus Zensar Technologies Ltd. and Vice Versa

    ... ...
    ... ... lanation 1 to section 115JB(2). In view of the said decision we dismiss the ground raised by the assessee. 4. In the result both the appeals are partly allowed in terms of the order above. The decision was pronounced in the open court on 15.12.2010.


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1257 - ITAT KOLKATA

    Susanta Biswas Versus ITO, Ward-1 (1) , Durgapur

    ... ...
    ... ... filed by the assessee and after giving reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. We order accordingly. 9. In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order is Pronounced in the Open Court on 01.12.2010


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1256 - ITAT DELHI

    Cosmos Fibre Glass Limited Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3 (1) , New Delhi

    ... ...
    ... ... d that the said entry was accommodation entry. We direct accordingly. 13. For statistical purposes, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed in the manner indicated hereinabove. Decision pronounced in the open Court on 31st December, 2010.


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1255 - ITAT BANGALORE

    Wendt (India) Ltd. Versus Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range 5, Bangalore

    ... ...
    ... ... ional ground raised by the assessee during the course of hearing becomes superfluous and, hence, it has not been addressed to. 8. In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed. Pronounced in the open court on this 21st day of December, 2010.


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1253 - ITAT HYDERABAD

    M/s. Rishabh Polymers (P) Ltd., Versus ACIT, Cir-2 (1) , Hyderabad. And vice-versa

    ... ...
    ... ... the ground raised by the assessee with regard to surcharge is dismissed as such. 8 In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed while the appeal of the revenue is dismissed. Order was pronounced in the open Court on 10- 12-2010.


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1249 - ITAT MUMBAI

    John Fowler (India) Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly known as John Fowler (India) Ltd.) , Versus Income Tax Officer 1 (2) (1) , Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai

    ... ...
    ... ... rtunity of being heard to the assessee. The grounds taken by the assessee are therefore partly allowed for statistical purpose. 51. In the result the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 8-12-2010.


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1247 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    Ramesh Agarwal, Rafiq Tinwala, Satyendra Singh Gupta, Jayesh Gangadia Versus Commissioner of Customs (Import) , Nhava Sheva

    ... ...
    ... ... y amount imposed on each of them within 8 weeks from today and report compliance on 11.2.2011. Subject to compliance with the above direction, pre-deposit of the balance amount shall remain waived till the pendency of the appeal. (Dictated in Court)


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1245 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

    Zeo Chem Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Asst. Commisisoner of Income Tax Circle-1, Bhavnagar

    ... ...
    ... ... ut to direct the Assessing Officer to recompute the penalty on the income assessed. We order accordingly. 9. In the result, the appeal of the Assessee may be treated as partly allowed. Order signed, dated and pronounced in the Court on 31/ 12 /2010.


  • 2010 (12) TMI 1243 - ITAT MUMBAI

    Priyanka Chopra Versus ACIT Cir 11 (1) , Central Circle 23, Mumbai

    ... ...
    ... ... we dismiss the ground no.2 of the appeal of the assessee being infructuous. 28. In sum and substance the appeal bearing ITA No. 4045/Mum/2009 is allowed and appeal being ITA No. 2019/Mum/2010 is dismissed. Pronounced in the open court on 10.12.2010


1........
 
 
 
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version