Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Case Laws
Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax 2014 TMI Tri Service Tax - Tri 2014 (6) TMI Service Tax - 2014 TMI 2014 TMI Tri 2014 (6) TMI Tri Service Tax - 2014 TMI Tri Service Tax - 2014 (6) TMI Tri
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

Service Tax - Tribunal - Case Laws

Showing 1 to 20 of 135 Records

  • 2014 (6) TMI 960 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

    Cheminova India Limited Versus Commr of Central Excise & S.T., Surat-II

    Waiver of pre-deposit - Demand of service tax alongwith interest and penalties - Ineligible Cenvat credit - Cenvat credit availed of service tax paid by the service providers in respect of the effluent/waste management in the factory premises - Held that - the definition of the input service as enshrined in Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 clearly envisages the eligibility to avail Cenvat credit of the service tax paid, inasmuch as unle....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 955 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    M/s. Classic Builders (Madras) Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai

    Restoration of appeal - Dismissed for non-compliance - Assessee prayed that it may be permitted to deposit the balance amount of ₹ 37,00,000/- in instalments - Held that - the applicant had not complied with the stay order till date. Besides, there is no provision for allowing to pay the balance pre-deposit amount in instalments, after dismissing the appeal. - Decided against the applicant....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 865 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    THE GMTD BSNL Versus CC & CE, MEERUT-I

    Condonation of delay - Disallowance of CENVAT Credit - Penalty u/s 11AC - Held that - appellant assumes that there was no delay whatsoever in filing of the appeal, since the copy of the adjudication order was first served on the appellant on 09.11.2010, whereas the order was served on 28.04.2010. There is no explanation offered for the belated filing of the appeal. It is the clear case of Revenue that the order in original was served on the autho....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 864 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    ROHAN RAVINDRA RAJE Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI II

    Waiver of pre-deposit - Service of order - Whether the service of the adjudication order through Speed Post is proper or not - Held that - As held by the Hon ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana in the case of Best Dyeing (2007 (10) TMI 422 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT), the service through Speed Post is not a proper service. The Hon ble High Court has also observed that in the Finance Act, 2013, an amendment took place in Section 37C of t....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 863 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

    M/s SHREE BHAIRAV TRAVELS Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, VADODARA-II

    Service Tax demand - difference in the figures available in the income tax returns and the value of services declared in the ST-3 returns filed by the appellants - Held that - It is observed that calculation of Service Tax liability based on the income tax return and ST-3 returns is the basic point of the Revenue. Filing documents and pointing of correct calculation in determining of Service Tax liability can always be agitated by the appellant b....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 862 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    M/s BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KANPUR

    Adjustment of shortfall of tax with excess payment of service tax - demand based on difference ST-3 return - Demand of service tax u/s 11D - Enhancement in rate of tax - Held that - The appellant s plea is that there was excess payment to the extent of about Rs.13 lakhs during October, 2003 and if this excess amount is taken into account, there would not be any demand against them under Section 11D. The appellant s counsel has vehemently pleaded ....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 834 - CESTAT KOLKATA

    M/s TINPLATE COMPANY OF INDIA LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, JAMSHEDPUR

    Leviability of Service Tax - consignment agency services - Clearing and Forwarding Agent Service - job of conversion of raw materials into finished goods on job-work basis - Held that - Applicant are engaged by M/s. Tata Steel Ltd. for conversion of raw material into finished goods and deliver the same to various stockyards. For that the Applicant are paid a fixed conversion charges. We also find an agreement dated 30.03.1998 whereby the Applican....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 833 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    M/s. Agarwal Trading Co. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise Jaipur II

    Demand of service tax - Rent a cab service - outdoor catering services - Invocation of extended period of limitation - Held that - Admittedly, the show cause notice issued on 26.4.2006 pertaining to the period 8.7.04 to 3.2.2005 is barred by normal period of limitation. Further, the original adjudicating authority having granted the benefit of section 80 of the Finance Act to the appellant, has held that there was no suppression on the part of th....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 832 - CESTAT BANGALORE

    COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, SERVICE TAX CEMMISSIONERATE, BANGALORE Versus AXA BUSINESS SERVICES PVT LTD., BANGALORE

    Denial of CENVAT Credit - order beyond the scope of show cause notice - Input services - Refund claim - nexus with the output service - Held that - Original adjudicating authority as well as the first appellate authority have considered the issue of eligibility of CENVAT credit in respect of services received by them and held that many services cannot be considered as input services since they have no nexus with the output service provided by the....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 831 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

    M/s. Essar Projects Limited Versus Commissioner Central Excise & ST., Rajkot

    Works Contract Composition Scheme - whether the appellant is eligible for Composition Scheme under the Works Contract (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007 for a works contract entered with M/s. Essar Oil Limited when some advance payments were received by the appellant prior to 01.6.2007 i.e. before introduction of Works Contract Service. - Extended period of limitation - Held that - in respect of the services provided afte....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 830 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    M/s KG DENIM LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, SALEM

    Business Exhibitions conducted abroad - Technical Inspections were done outside India - Import of services - reverse charge - service tax liability under Section 66A of Finance Act, 1994 - parties located abroad - Held that - payments made by the appellant were in respect of exhibitions conducted abroad. Similarly it is seen that the Technical Inspections were done outside India. - as per the provisions of the Rule 3 (ii) of Taxation of Services ....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 800 - CESTAT BANGALORE

    Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax - BELGAUM Versus VRL LOGISTICS LTD.

    Waiver of penalty invoking section 80 - courier service - delayed payment of service tax with interest - Held that - The very fact that the matter went right up to the Supreme Court and finally it was decided against the assessee shows that assessee definitely felt that they had a case for non-payment of service tax. That being the position, I am unable to agree that there was willful intention on the part of the assessee not to comply with tax l....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 799 - CESTAT KOLKATA

    Commr. of Central Excise, Ranchi Versus M/s CMPDI, Ranchi

    Restoration of appeal - Demand of service tax, interest and imposition of penalty - Appeal was dismissed for want of COD clearance - Held that - That being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 31.03.2008 passed by the ld.Commissioner, the Department has preferred an appeal as well as the Applicant. At that time, the Applicants choose to file an appeal against the confirmation of the part of the demand against them and elected not to contest that....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 798 - CESTAT KOLKATA

    M/s. APL (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, KOLKATA

    Waiver of pre deposit - valuation - Steamer Agent s Service - inclusion of various charges collected - Advance Manifest Charges (AMS), Bunker Surcharges (BS) and Currency Adjustment Factor (CAF) Charges from the Shippers in India and transferred the said amounts to the Overseas Liner - Business Support Service - Held that - prima facie, the Applicant could able to show that Bunker Surcharges (BS) and Currency Adjustment Factor (CAF) Charges are n....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 797 - CESTAT KOLKATA

    M/s. NARAYANI SONS PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS & SERVICE TAX, BHUBANESWAR-II

    Waiver of predeposit - mining and post mining services - Cargo Handling Services - Mining of Mineral Oil or Gas Services - transportation of iron ore at their iron and manganese mines, hiring of rock-breakers with excavator at the mines, hiring of machineries for shifting/removal of over-burdens and excavation/loading, shifting and unloading - shifting, loading and transportation and removal of ROM and over-burdens to the fines/sized ores from di....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 796 - CESTAT BANGALORE

    Ramakrishna Electrical Winding Works Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Visakhapatnam  II

    Management, maintenance or repair service - Exclusion of value of material - appellant disclosed 30 of the consideration received, assuming that 70 of the consideration received (asserted by the appellant to be on the basis of an industry norm ) to represent the value of goods and raw materials deemed to have been sold to the recipient of the service. - Held that - wherever there are complex transactions including components of service and sale o....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 795 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NAGPUR Versus M/s SPENTEX INDUSTRIES LTD

    Denial of refund claim - Exemption of CHA and Port Services by virtue of Notification No. 41/2007-ST - Commissioner (Appeals) allowed refund claim - Held that - refund under Notification No. 41/2007-ST cannot be denied by reviewing the correctness of the Service Tax payment at the end of service providers - Following decision of Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore Vs. Anant Commodities Pvt. Ltd. & others reported in 2009 (10) TMI 229 - CES....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 768 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    The General Manager, M/s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Versus CCE, Raipur and vice-versa

    Adjustment of excess payment of service tax - CENVAT Credit - Held that - if during a particular month there is excess payment of tax, it does not mean that the excess paid amount had been recovered from the customers as the service tax has been paid on the estimated bill collection amount and the exact amount of service tax payable is determined only when the accurate figures of collection against the bills are available. When this is the positi....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 767 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

    M/s Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Versus CST, Ahmedabad

    Waiver of pre deposit - Demand of service tax - Held that - appellant had deposited an amount as has been claimed and appropriated by the Adjudicating Authority. On perusal of records, we find that the issue is an arguable one and needs to be gone into details as to whether the appellant is liable to tax on receiving/providing various services during the material period. Since the appellant is contesting the issue on merits, we consider the amoun....... + More


  • 2014 (6) TMI 766 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    CCE, Ludhiana Versus M/s Nestle India Ltd.

    Demand of service tax - Technical testing and analysis service - testing of the samples received from job workers who are manufacturing the goods for the respondent on job work basis and the samples received from their sister concerns abroad for testing - Held that - As regards the testing of the samples received from the job workers, these samples are from the goods which were being manufactured by the job workers for the respondent on job work ....... + More


1........
 
 
 
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version